What background checks does ICE conduct for new agents and contractors?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
ICE requires all applicants—federal hires and contractor employees alike—to undergo comprehensive background investigations intended to assess suitability, fitness, trustworthiness and national security eligibility; these checks draw on federal and commercial databases, questionnaires, fingerprinting, drug testing in some contexts, adjudicator review, and an ongoing “Continuous Vetting” program once employed [1] [2] [3]. Public reporting and ICE’s own materials show the basic components but also reveal gaps between policy and practice when the agency conducts rapid hiring or allows “reciprocity” exceptions that let some people begin work before full investigation completion [4] [5] [6].
1. What the vetting process is meant to cover and who runs it
ICE’s Personnel Security Division (PSD) oversees personnel vetting to determine if applicants meet suitability, fitness, security, and national security access requirements, and the agency states background investigations are mandatory for anyone performing duties on an ICE contract or working for ICE [1] [2]. The stated goals are to gauge reliability, conduct, character, and loyalty to the United States—language ICE uses to justify the breadth of its checks [1] [2].
2. The investigation steps: questionnaires, fingerprints, databases and vendors
Applicants normally complete electronic investigative questionnaires via OPM’s e-QIP system, provide fingerprints and other personal data, and have their histories checked against government and commercial databases; ICE documents note background investigations are scheduled through a contracted vendor and investigative data are transmitted securely to ICE’s Personnel Security Unit [7] [3] [1]. Podcast guidance from ICE personnel explains e-QIP and the early-stage “entry on duty” vetting that precedes full adjudication [4].
3. Adjudication, clearances and reciprocity rules
Once investigation materials are gathered, trained adjudicators evaluate the package against predetermined standards to decide fitness for duty or security eligibility, and ICE can accept “reciprocity”—previous federal investigative results—to clear individuals to start work before a new background is completed [1] [4]. Contractors are subject to the same evaluation process for fitness to perform work on behalf of ICE, and contracting officer representatives receive status reports during vetting [1].
4. Additional tools: polygraph, drug testing and public-trust designations
For certain operational roles—criminal investigators and deportation officers—ICE includes a polygraph program at entry level as part of pre-employment screening when candidates elect it, and ICE policy and reporting also identify drug tests and public-trust background checks as parts of the screening for some hires and contractors [4] [8] [5]. ICE’s public materials stress that false information can lead to unsuitability findings and denial of sensitive or classified access [2].
5. Continuous vetting and ongoing monitoring
After entry on duty, ICE enrolls employees and contractor personnel in Continuous Vetting, which regularly reassesses backgrounds and may use updated commercial and government data and other lawful information at any time to determine continued eligibility—a process ICE says is designed to detect new disqualifying information post-hire [1].
6. Where official policy and reporting diverge: practical controversies and limits in public records
Multiple news reports and watchdog accounts document cases where recruits entered training before background checks, failed drug tests while in training, or were dismissed for criminal histories—indicating that reciprocity, expedited hiring, and implementation choices can create gaps between ICE’s written vetting standards and practice [5] [6] [9]. ICE asserts that intensive background investigations and clearances apply to all hires, but public sources also show ICE sometimes allows early starts based on prior clearances or to avoid losing candidates, a tension the agency acknowledges in its podcast and vetting FAQs [4] [1].
7. What this reporting does not resolve
Public sources document the components ICE uses—e-QIP questionnaires, fingerprinting, contractor vendors, adjudicators, database checks, polygraphs for some roles, drug testing, and Continuous Vetting—but do not provide exhaustive checklists or every operational threshold (for example, specific databases queried, timing details for each hire type, or exact adjudicative rules in every category) in the public materials provided here; those finer operational details are not fully exposed in the cited documents [1] [3] [7] [4] [2].