What physical fitness and firearms qualifications are required during ICE Basic Training?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
ICE’s basic-training physical standards reported in multiple outlets require a 1.5‑mile run in roughly 14 minutes and a modest set of calisthenics — commonly cited figures are 15 push‑ups and 32 sit‑ups — and agency guidance says applicants must pass a pre‑employment Physical Fitness Test (PFT) before attending academy training [1] [2] [3]. Firearms standards are administered by ICE’s Office of Firearms and Tactical Programs (OFTP) and use a handgun qualification course that traditionally fires 50 rounds with an 80% (200/250) minimum score on a DHS‑ICE target [4] [5].
1. Physical standards on paper: what candidates are asked to do
ICE posts that applicants must clear a pre‑employment Physical Fitness Test to enter training [3] [6]. Reporting by The Atlantic, Newsweek and others cites a basic fitness battery commonly described in coverage as at least 15 push‑ups, 32 sit‑ups and a 1.5‑mile run in roughly 14 minutes [1] [7] [2]. Other outlets and agency documents show minor variations — e.g., run cutoffs reported as “under 14:25” or “under 14:30” in some stories — indicating the run standard is the central endurance hurdle [8] [9].
2. How the standards are applied in practice: screening and timing
ICE’s USAJOBS hiring language confirms a mandatory pre‑employment PFT screens applicants who will attend the Basic Immigration Enforcement Training Program and related transition programs [3]. Reporting from The Atlantic and follow‑ups note the agency has adjusted when fitness checks occur during a rapid hiring surge; DHS said it is “moving fitness checks earlier in the training sequence” to improve efficiency, which suggests timing and sequencing — not just the pass/fail metrics — have changed amid expansion [1].
3. Firearms qualification: the formal requirement and how it’s scored
ICE’s Office of Firearms and Tactical Programs runs firearms and tactical training and issues the qualification standards used across the agency [4]. Publicly available summaries of ICE pistol courses describe a 50‑round course with a maximum of 250 points and a minimum passing score of 200 (80%) on the DHS‑ICE‑QT (25yd) target; some training‑provider summaries and range guides reiterate a 38/50 minimum or equivalent ~76–80% threshold [5] [10].
4. Operational context: cadence, gear and requalification
ICE policy and historical practice tie firearms qualifications to operational gear and regular recertification. ICE directives and handbooks lay out approved weapons, courses of fire and the expectation that agents qualify in full duty gear and attend periodic requalification — elements that make the qualification a sustained requirement, not a one‑time test [11] [12] [13].
5. Disagreement and reporting variation: where accounts diverge
Contemporary reporting shows differences in precise numbers and application. The Atlantic and mainstream outlets report the 15/32/1.5‑mile format [7] [1], while some tabloids and secondary sites cite a four‑event test including a 220‑yard sprint and slightly different push‑up totals [9]. ICE’s own hiring notices emphasize a PFT requirement but do not reproduce the exact publicized numbers in all materials, and ICE officials told reporters the failure figures cited “reflect a subset of candidates” [3] [9].
6. What coverage does not settle: scope, exemptions and recent policy shifts
Available sources do not include a single, current ICE‑published table that reconciles every cited metric for every trainee category; instead there are agency hiring pages, an OFTP mission statement, ICE firearms directives and multiple news reports with slightly different figures [3] [4] [11] [1]. Sources note exemptions and “prior‑service” streams that follow a streamlined validation process but remain subject to medical, fitness and background checks — indicating different candidate pools may face different practical hurdles [1] [7].
7. Why this matters: public safety, hiring surge and oversight concerns
Multiple outlets frame these standards against a backdrop of a rapid hiring push and shortened training timelines; critics worry lowered or inconsistently applied screening risks misconduct or operational failures, while DHS and ICE officials argue standards remain in force even as processes shift earlier in onboarding [1] [14]. That tension — between speed and quality assurance — is the clearest unresolved issue in reporting to date [1] [14].
Limitations: this analysis relies on the provided reporting, agency pages and public directives; available sources do not present a single unified ICE table reconciling every fitness and firearms metric by trainee category [3] [11]. Where outlets disagree, I have cited the relevant pieces so readers can weigh differences themselves [1] [7] [5].