Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

ICE Charlottes WEB

Checked on November 20, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

DHS announced “Operation Charlotte’s Web,” a surge of Border Patrol, ICE and DHS agents into Charlotte intended to target criminal noncitizens; reporting shows roughly 81 arrests in the first five hours and more than 130 people detained over a weekend, with other outlets reporting “nearly 150” arrests statewide effects [1] [2]. The operation has provoked large protests, complaints from local officials about lack of notice and about interactions with U.S. citizens, and disputes over tactics and messaging [3] [4] [5].

1. What is “Operation Charlotte’s Web” and who announced it?

DHS publicly described “Operation Charlotte’s Web” as a law‑enforcement surge in Charlotte deploying ICE, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and other DHS components to target criminal illegal aliens; the department framed it as an effort to remove noncitizens with criminal records [6] [7]. Reporting and local officials say the federal push was not broadly announced to local leadership in advance, creating tensions between federal and city officials [7] [3].

2. How many people were arrested and detained?

Numbers vary by outlet: ABC News reported more than 130 people taken into custody over a weekend with 81 arrested in the first five hours of the operation [1]. Local reporting and TV stations describe agents making 81 arrests in one day and show CBP activity along immigrant corridors [8] [1]. A regional TV station and state reporting used the phrase “nearly 150” arrests when describing the weekend’s impact across the area [2]. These discrepancies reflect different counting windows and agency versus media tallies [1] [2].

3. Allegations of wrongful or abusive tactics — what evidence exists?

Multiple outlets published videos and eyewitness accounts alleging aggressive tactics, including agents breaking a vehicle window in an interaction that later involved a man identified by some as a U.S. citizen and other scenes of arrests that left protesters and community members alarmed [9] [10] [7]. Governor Josh Stein and local leaders accused agents of intimidating behavior and racial profiling in statements cited by the press [10]. CBS‑obtained DHS internal documents (reported by some outlets) indicate Border Patrol commanders were being shifted into Charlotte operations, which feeds scrutiny of tactics used in previous city operations [11] [12].

4. Community reaction — protests, fear and local elected officials

Hundreds rallied in Charlotte and in other North Carolina cities against the operation, with protesters surrounding agents, blowing whistles and chanting “No Border Patrol in Charlotte,” and demonstrations prompted shops to lock doors on immigrant corridors [5] [8] [13]. Charlotte’s mayor and local members of Congress publicly rebuked the raids and complained about lack of transparency; advocates report increased anxiety in Latino and immigrant communities and advise legal precautions [3] [2].

5. Federal framing vs. local and media reporting — competing narratives

DHS and federal spokespeople describe the operation as targeting people who “have all broken the immigration laws” and focus on criminal records [1] [6]. Local officials, advocates and many news outlets emphasize the surprise deployment, the breadth of arrests, and incidents where American citizens were reportedly detained or confronted, framing the operation as causing fear and potentially ensnaring lawful residents [7] [10] [4]. Both perspectives appear repeatedly in coverage; available sources do not mention a full and independently verified breakdown of how many arrested were noncitizens with criminal convictions versus other immigration statuses.

6. Regional and political context — part of a broader enforcement blitz

Reporting places Charlotte within a nationwide series of enforcement surges that also included Los Angeles and Chicago earlier in the year — operations critics link to the Trump administration’s broader deportation agenda [1] [7]. Internal documents and reporting suggest the DHS is coordinating multiple named operations and moving personnel across cities, which explains why community and political pushback in Charlotte echoes reactions from other municipalities [12] [11].

7. Limits of current reporting and what remains unclear

Media outlets differ on totals, timelines and the precise legal status of many people detained [1] [2]. Available sources do not provide a fully disaggregated, independently verified roster showing convictions or criminal charges for each person arrested, nor do they supply a complete federal after‑action report addressing claims that U.S. citizens were improperly detained [1] [10]. Local accounts and federal statements conflict on certain incidents; where a source explicitly disputes a claim, I cite it above [10] [9].

8. What to watch next

Look for official DHS after‑action summaries, local prosecutor or sheriff statements about cases referred, and independent legal advocacy groups’ documentation to clarify charges and citizenship status of those arrested; also watch for municipal or state inquiries into use of force or civil‑rights complaints, which several local leaders and advocates have signaled they may pursue [3] [2] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What is ICE Charlotte's Web and how does it relate to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement?
Has ICE used a program or operation named 'Charlotte's Web'—what were its goals and outcomes?
Are there legal or civil-rights concerns linked to any ICE operation called Charlotte's Web?
Which news outlets have reported on 'ICE Charlotte's Web' and what primary documents exist about it?
Could 'Charlotte's Web' refer to an ICE data or surveillance initiative and what are its privacy implications?