Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How many civilian casualties have been reported in ICE operations since 2020?
Executive Summary
Reported civilian deaths tied to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations since 2020 are split between deaths in custody and deaths from uses of force during enforcement; available analyses report dozens of in-custody deaths across recent years and at least dozens of deaths from shootings and enforcement tactics in earlier periods, but no single authoritative tally isolates all civilian casualties since 2020 in the provided materials. The records and studies supplied show substantial reporting gaps, contested trends, and divergent counts depending on methodology and timeframe [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. What advocates and studies are claiming about deaths in custody — a stark tally with preventable patterns
Advocates and public-interest studies document 52 deaths in ICE custody from 2017–2021, many characterized as preventable and tied to systemic failures such as inadequate medical care and oversight breakdowns; this is a central claim of reports that emphasize negligence and lack of accountability [1] [5]. Another analysis that focuses on FY2018–2020 reports 35 deaths since April 2018, highlighting an alarming increase in the death rate between FY2019 and FY2020 driven in part by COVID-19 and suicide, and classifies at least half of recent deaths as potentially preventable [2]. These figures point to a consistent concern about preventability and institutional responsibility, but they are reported across differently bounded studies and timeframes, complicating a single cumulative count [1] [2].
2. What updates covering FY2021–2023 say — a mixed signal of fewer deaths but continued oversight problems
An FY2021–2023 update indicates a decline in the number of in-custody deaths to 12 during that update period, compared with 38 deaths in the prior studied period, and notes a decrease in COVID-19-related fatalities [3] [6]. Advocates still document ongoing use of solitary confinement, delayed medical care, and other concerning practices tied to deaths between 2017–2021, indicating that improvements in raw death counts coexist with persistent accountability gaps [5]. The simultaneous reporting of fewer recent deaths and continued critiques of oversight signals either partial improvements in conditions or shifting patterns of risk and reporting, but the materials do not reconcile these possibilities into a single authoritative trend line [3] [5].
3. Deaths and shootings during enforcement operations — a different category with separate counts
Independent reporting on ICE use of force documents 59 shootings by ICE officers from 2015–2021, resulting in at least 23 deaths and 24 injuries, but these pieces do not produce a precise civilian-casualty count limited to 2020 onward [4]. Other investigations into border enforcement report migrant deaths tied to pursuits, vehicle incidents, and aggressive detention tactics in border regions, yet they similarly lack a consolidated, year-by-year civilian casualty total for 2020–present in the supplied analyses [7]. These sources indicate that force-related fatalities are a material component of overall civilian harm associated with ICE operations, distinct from in-custody deaths and unevenly tracked across reporters.
4. Why counts diverge — methodology, timeframe, and what gets counted as a civilian casualty
Differences among studies stem from which deaths are included (in-custody only vs. enforcement shootings vs. border-related disappearances), the timeframes chosen (calendar years vs. fiscal years vs. rolling multi-year windows), and definitions of preventability and cause (medical neglect, suicide, COVID-19, use of force) [2] [4] [3]. Advocates’ reports focus on institutional responsibility and flag preventable deaths, while other studies emphasize statistical trends across admissions and fiscal years, producing apparently conflicting signals about whether the death rate rose or fell across adjacent intervals [1] [6]. The provided materials show substantive reporting gaps and inconsistent classifications that prevent a single definitive civilian-casualty number since 2020.
5. Cross-checking trends — recent declines but unresolved accountability and data quality concerns
The FY2021–2023 update’s report of 12 deaths and a reduced COVID-19 toll suggests improvement on some metrics, yet advocates’ longer-term counts and case-based critiques emphasize continuing systemic failures that likely contributed to prior fatalities [3] [5]. Reporting on shootings and enforcement-related migrant deaths underscores additional categories of civilian harm not captured in detention tallies [4] [7]. Together, these materials present a qualified conclusion: documented in-custody deaths decreased in the most recent FY update while force-related and enforcement deaths remain incompletely tracked, and systemic investigations and consequence mechanisms continue to be criticized [3] [8].
6. Bottom line — a precise number is not available in the provided sources; these are the solid takeaways
From the supplied analyses, the clearest, attributable figures are 52 in-custody deaths from 2017–2021 (many deemed preventable) and an FY2021–2023 update reporting 12 deaths, but the materials do not consolidate all categories of civilian casualties for 2020–present or reconcile overlapping periods; enforcement shootings through 2021 include 23 deaths among incidents documented between 2015–2021 [1] [3] [4]. The most defensible statement is that dozens of civilian deaths are documented across detention and enforcement operations since 2020, but no single authoritative count for 2020–present is supplied here due to methodological and reporting gaps, leaving outstanding questions about the full scale of civilian harm [2] [4].