Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What percentage of ICE deportations in 2024 were for violent crimes?
Executive Summary
The available ICE Fiscal Year 2024 data show that 271,484 Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) removals occurred and 88,763 of those removals involved individuals with criminal histories, which ICE reports as 32.7% of total removals; however, ICE does not publish a single explicit percentage labeled “violent crimes” for all removals, and the breakdown of specific violent-offense removals requires interpretation of itemized counts for categories such as homicide, kidnapping, and sexual assault [1]. This analysis reconciles those headline figures, explains what the statistics do and do not prove, and highlights reporting gaps and alternative perspectives.
1. What the headline numbers actually say — a clear tally that still leaves questions
ICE’s FY2024 Annual Report records 271,484 ERO removals and states 88,763 of those removed had criminal histories, which ICE calculates as 32.7% of removals; the report also lists itemized offense counts including 2,699 homicides, 2,423 kidnappings, and 16,552 sexual assaults, among other crimes, providing a partial view into violent-offense removals but not a consolidated violent-crime percentage [1]. The central factual point is that roughly one-third of removals involved people with criminal records, but ICE’s published tables do not deliver a single row summing “violent crimes” across all categories, requiring analysts to decide which offense codes count as violent and whether to count charges, convictions, or both.
2. Why advocates and critics can draw different conclusions from the same data
Supporters of ICE enforcement emphasize the absolute counts of serious offenses—for example the thousands of homicides, kidnappings, and sexual assaults listed—framing removals as public-safety actions; that interpretation is grounded in the itemized offense tallies presented by ICE [1]. Critics note that the 32.7% criminal-history share includes a wide range of offenses, and ICE reports an average of 5.63 convictions or charges per person, meaning the metric conflates minor and serious offenses in one percentage and can overstate the share of removals motivated by violent-crime prevention absent a defined violent-crime numerator [2] [1]. Both readings use the same dataset but emphasize different parts.
3. What the ICE data cannot resolve — definitional and reporting gaps that matter
ICE’s FY2024 materials do not provide a single, agency-declared percentage specifically for “violent crimes,” nor do they consistently distinguish charges versus convictions or clarify whether listed counts reflect unique individuals or total offense counts per individual, creating ambiguity when aggregating violent-offense totals [1] [3]. The Enforcement and Removal Operations statistics for mid‑2024 quarters focus on operational volumes rather than crime-type breakdowns, so researchers lack an authoritative methodology from ICE for turning itemized offense counts into a defensible violent-crime removal percentage [3]. This omission is the main constraint on deriving a single, uncontested percent for violent‑crime deportations.
4. How to approximate a violent-crime percentage responsibly with existing figures
Analysts seeking an approximate violent-crime share can sum offense categories commonly classed as violent—homicide, kidnapping, sexual assault, aggravated assault—and divide by total removals, but ICE provides these counts as offense tallies rather than a labeled violent‑crime subtotal, and ICE reports multiple offenses per person on average, so such a calculation risks double-counting individuals and inflating a percentage [1] [2]. A defensible approximation therefore requires clear rules—counting unique individuals, choosing conviction vs. charge criteria, and transparently excluding nonviolent offenses—none of which ICE supplies in a single authoritative table.
5. Complementary enforcement datapoints and targeted actions that shape interpretation
ICE public statements about targeted operations—such as a January 2024 enforcement sweep arresting 171 noncitizens with pending charges or convictions for murder, homicide, or assault against children—illustrate agency priorities and the presence of individuals with severe violent allegations within enforcement actions, but such operations are episodic and do not by themselves quantify the full scope of violent-crime removals for the year [4]. Operational highlights provide context about enforcement focus but cannot substitute for comprehensive, de-duplicated statistics required to compute an exact violent-crime removal percentage.
6. Bottom line and transparent next steps for precision-seeking users
The factual bottom line is that 32.7% of ICE FY2024 removals had criminal histories and ICE lists thousands of specific violent offenses among removals, but ICE does not present a single published percentage of removals that were exclusively for violent crimes, and deriving one requires methodological choices ICE has not specified [1]. To resolve the question precisely, researchers should request ICE-provided unique‑individual counts for predefined violent-offense categories and clarify whether counts reflect convictions or charges; absent that, any violent-crime percentage is an analyst’s approximation rather than an agency-declared fact.