Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Have any class-action lawsuits or investigations documented US citizen detentions by ICE since 2020?
Executive Summary
US citizens have been documented as detained by U.S. immigration agents since 2020, and those incidents have prompted both individual lawsuits and at least one class-action settlement addressing ICE detainer practices; investigative reporting and litigation in 2024–2025 have driven congressional inquiries and new legal challenges. Evidence compiled by ProPublica and subsequent reporting shows over 170 U.S. citizens detained in a single year of reporting, multiple individual suits alleging unlawful or violent detentions, and a December 2024 class-action settlement (Gonzalez v. ICE) that limits certain detainer uses and requires neutral probable-cause review procedures [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Shocking Numbers That Spurred Lawmakers into Action
Investigative reporting in October 2025 documented more than 170 U.S. citizens detained by immigration agents in the first nine months of a reporting year, allegations that included racial profiling and failures to verify citizenship before detention; that reporting directly triggered a joint congressional investigation and demands for accountability from lawmakers including Rep. Dan Goldman and Sen. Elizabeth Warren [1] [5]. The ProPublica-led revelations, dated October 16–21, 2025, portrayed a pattern of detention outcomes often resulting in dropped charges or dismissals and alleged use of force ranging from tackling to tasing, which lawmakers cited when calling for investigations and reforms [2] [5]. These developments converted investigative findings into formal political pressure on ICE and the Department of Homeland Security, elevating isolated incidents into a systemic oversight question in Congress [1] [5].
2. Class-Action Settlement That Changed Detainer Practice Nationwide
A class-action settlement in Gonzalez v. ICE, approved in December 2024, prohibits ICE from issuing certain immigration detainers absent a process for neutral review of probable cause comparable to Fourth Amendment standards, and the settlement’s restrictions extend for five years—creating a nationwide policy constraint on detainers [4]. The settlement represents a judicial check on administrative detainer practices and may reshape local cooperation with ICE, because detainers previously could be issued without robust pre-detention judicial or neutral review. This legal outcome is distinct from criminal prosecutions or individual tort claims: it imposes process reforms intended to curb mistaken or procedurally deficient detentions across jurisdictions, and it directly addresses grievances that underlie some citizen detention allegations documented in later reporting [4].
3. Individual Lawsuits Detailing Citizens Wrongfully Held and Force Allegations
Multiple individual suits filed in 2025 document U.S. citizens detained despite presenting identification and asserting citizenship; one recent federal case asserts a U.S. citizen was detained twice in Alabama after showing a REAL ID, and another complaint alleges violent arrests of a 79-year-old and an Iraq War veteran, with claims pursued under the Federal Tort Claims Act seeking damages for unlawful detention and excessive force [3] [6]. Plaintiffs frame these suits as efforts to halt what they call unconstitutional enforcement tactics and to obtain redress for physical harm and liberty deprivation; filings are part of a broader wave of litigation that complements class actions by seeking individual remedies and establishing factual records of how detentions occurred, including claims that agents ignored clear evidence of citizenship [7] [6].
4. Patterns Reported by Journalists and Lawyers Point to Common Failures
Reporting and legal filings converge on recurring themes: failure to properly verify citizenship, reliance on detainers without adequate probable-cause review, and instances of excessive force or misconduct during enforcement encounters. ProPublica’s October 2025 investigation and subsequent media coverage highlighted patterns that led to congressional inquiries, while plaintiffs’ lawyers and FTCA claims documented specific violent encounters prompting damage claims in federal court [1] [2] [6]. The evidence presented in these sources indicates systemic vulnerabilities in how ICE and related enforcement actors identify and process individuals, producing both wrongful detentions of citizens and legal exposure for the federal government, which faces billions in claims according to reporting on violent arrest suits [6] [1].
5. What This Means: Legal Remedies, Congressional Oversight, and Unanswered Questions
The combined record through late 2025 shows class-action settlements, individual federal lawsuits, investigative exposés, and congressional demands converging to produce policy consequences and legal scrutiny of ICE detainer and arrest practices [4] [3] [1] [5]. The Gonzalez settlement imposes procedural limits on detainers, litigation seeks compensation and factual findings in individual cases, and congressional probes aim to hold agencies accountable for patterns revealed by journalists. Major open questions remain about the full scope of citizen detentions since 2020, the consistency of agency compliance with settlement terms, and whether criminal or disciplinary accountability will follow from alleged abuses; ongoing investigations and court records from 2024–2025 will be the primary sources to watch for definitive answers [4] [2] [1].