Fact check: What is the % of false detainments in 2024 by ICE that were false

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided do not offer a specific percentage of false detainments by ICE in 2024 ^[1]. According to the sources, there is a lack of information on the exact percentage of false detainments by ICE in 2024 ^{[2] [3]}. However, some sources provide context on the characteristics of individuals detained by ICE, such as the fact that 70.4% of individuals held in ICE detention as of August 10, 2025, have no criminal conviction ^[4]. Additionally, it is reported that 65% of book-ins by ICE have no criminal convictions, and more than 93% have never been convicted of violent offenses ^[5]. The sources also discuss the challenges of analyzing ICE detention statistics and the methods used to overcome these challenges ^[2], as well as provide information on ICE's enforcement and removal operations in FY 2024 ^[6].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Key context missing from the original statement includes the definition of "false detainments" and how it would be measured ^[1]. Alternative viewpoints that could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue include the perspectives of immigrant advocacy groups, law enforcement agencies, and government officials ^[5]. Furthermore, the sources highlight the need for more detailed and accurate data on ICE detention statistics to better understand the scope of the issue ^{[2] [3]}. It is also important to consider the potential consequences of false detainments, including the impact on individuals and communities ^[4].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading due to its assumption that there is available data on the percentage of false detainments by ICE in 2024, when in fact, the sources indicate a lack of such information ^{[1] [3]}. The statement may also be biased towards implying that ICE detainments are often false, without providing evidence to support this claim ^[5]. The sources suggest that ICE has primarily detained individuals with no criminal convictions, which could be interpreted as either a positive or negative aspect of ICE's enforcement practices, depending on one's perspective ^[5]. Overall, the original statement may benefit from a more nuanced and informed approach, taking into account the complexities of ICE detention statistics and the various stakeholders involved ^[4].