What legal authority does ICE have to detain noncitizens versus U.S. citizens?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
ICE’s statutory authority to arrest and detain flows primarily from the Immigration and Nationality Act and related DHS policies, giving the agency broad administrative power over “aliens” believed removable and those in removal proceedings while barring civil immigration detention of U.S. citizens as a matter of law and policy [1]. Practically, that means ICE routinely detains noncitizens under civil immigration law, can arrest anyone (including citizens) for criminal offenses when acting as law enforcement, and — despite legal prohibitions — wrongful citizen detentions have occurred and prompted oversight demands .
1. Statutory backbone: broad civil authority over noncitizens
Congress empowered immigration enforcement through the Immigration and Nationality Act, which grants immigration officers authority to arrest, interrogate, and detain noncitizens suspected of removability and to hold persons during removal proceedings or under mandatory detention categories; ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations relies on that statutory framework to carry out administrative arrests and detentions of aliens .
2. Administrative detention versus criminal custody: different legal tracks
ICE’s detention of noncitizens is primarily civil and administrative — distinct from criminal incarceration — meaning detainees face immigration courts rather than criminal trials and are eligible for alternatives to detention or bond in many circumstances under statutory schemes . At the same time ICE officers may execute criminal arrest warrants, participate in task forces, and initiate prosecutions when criminal laws are implicated, blurring operational lines with standard law enforcement agencies .
3. U.S. citizens: a categorical prohibition on civil immigration detention (and real‑world errors)
ICE policy and authoritative reporting state that ICE “cannot assert its civil immigration enforcement authority to arrest and/or detain a U.S. citizen,” and multiple sources emphasize that ICE lacks legal authority to hold U.S. citizens in immigration custody; nevertheless, investigative reporting and congressional letters document cases where citizens were mistakenly detained, prompting calls for probes and corrective action [1].
4. Constitutional and procedural constraints that limit ICE power
Even when detaining noncitizens, ICE is constrained by the Fourth Amendment and other constitutional protections; statutory authorities that permit warrantless interrogation or short detentions (e.g., section 1357(a)) are subject to constitutional limits and judicial review, and detainees retain certain procedural avenues, including immigration hearings and federal challenges to detention .
5. Operational practices, detainers, and cooperation with local authorities
ICE commonly uses detainer requests to local jails and correctional facilities to prolong custody of noncitizens subject to removal, and the agency asserts general authority to detain aliens who are subject to removal or proceedings — practices that rely on partnerships with state and local officials and have been controversial in policy debates . Critics argue those cooperative mechanisms and ICE’s wide administrative discretion create systemic risks of misidentification and overreach .
6. Political framing, agency messaging, and oversight pressures
DHS and ICE emphasize that they do not deport U.S. citizens and point to detention standards and training for agents, while lawmakers, advocacy groups, and media have documented mistaken citizen detentions and pressed for investigations — revealing a clash between agency messaging and documented harms that fuels congressional oversight, litigation, and reform proposals . Reporting and watchdogs also highlight that ICE’s broad statutory powers are now routinely tested in courts and politics, with reform bills and legal challenges aiming to narrow where and how immigration detention can occur .