Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How many cases of mistaken identity have been reported by ICE in 2024?
Executive Summary
ICE did not publish a single, definitive count of “cases of mistaken identity” for 2024 in the materials provided; public reporting and news investigations instead document individual wrongful-detention instances and systemic data gaps that prevent a reliable aggregate. Government auditors and journalists highlight specific cases from 2024 and earlier that illustrate the problem, while the Government Accountability Office concluded ICE’s public detention data understates the total and recommended improved reporting [1] [2] [3].
1. What advocates and reporters are claiming about mistaken identity incidents — concrete stories, not counts
Journalistic accounts center on individual wrongful-detention stories showing how identity errors or misuse of watchlists can land people in ICE custody. NBC detailed Jessica Barahona-Martínez’s six-year detention tied to an Interpol Red Notice, framing the case as emblematic of how international databases and enforcement actions can ensnare the wrong person [2]. Law360 and other outlets described Nylssa Portillo Moreno and other immigrants who endured prolonged detention despite protections or documentation that should have prevented it, portraying these cases as symptomatic of operational failures within ICE lockups [3] [4].
2. Legal and civil-rights filings underscore wrongful detention but do not create an ICE tally
Reports of lawsuits and wrongful-detention suits file individual allegations against ICE and related facilities, explaining harm and procedural failures but not producing a centralized count of mistaken-identity incidents. Law360 and Latin Times reported litigation and class-action style claims by detained migrants alleging long confinement and inadequate review of documentation—evidence of systemic problems but not of a numerical total compiled by ICE [3] [5]. These legal documents are important for establishing patterns of harm; they do not substitute for official, agency-level incident reporting.
3. The Government Accountability Office flagged ICE’s public data as incomplete — a structural barrier to producing a count
A July 2024 GAO review found that ICE’s public reporting understates the total number of individuals detained and recommended that ICE expand its reporting to include all detentions and related metrics [1]. The GAO’s audit implies that even if researchers attempted to compile a 2024 total of mistaken-identity cases from public ICE outputs, the agency’s current disclosures would likely miss instances. This institutional limitation explains why neither journalists nor civil-rights groups could confidently cite an ICE-provided 2024 figure for mistaken identity cases.
4. What the provided sources document about 2024 specifically — scattered incidents, no official sum
The supplied sources document several 2024 incidents and cases of wrongful or prolonged detention, offering qualitative evidence of mistaken identity and wrongful detention patterns rather than a numeric total. NBC’s February 2024 feature of Barahona-Martínez and April 2024 Law360 reporting on other wrongful detention suits show the existence of such incidents, while reporters and advocates emphasize procedural flaws and enforcement missteps [2] [3] [4]. None of these pieces say ICE released a distinct count of “cases of mistaken identity” for 2024.
5. Conflicting timelines and out-of-scope material in the dataset — watch for later reporting
One provided analysis references an April 2025 Associated Press story about a U.S. citizen held and later reported in 2025 [6]. While that 2025 case reinforces ongoing concerns about wrongful detention and identification errors, it falls outside the 2024 timeframe asked about and underscores how incidents continue beyond 2024. The dataset also includes apparent errors or dead links that produce no usable data, illustrating the fragmented nature of publicly available reporting on these cases [7].
6. Multiple viewpoints and likely agendas in the documents — litigation, watchdogs, and newsrooms
The corpus mixes investigative journalism, legal filings, and audit findings, each carrying different objectives: news outlets aim to spotlight individual injustices [2] [3], civil-rights-oriented coverage highlights systemic harm and litigation [5], and the GAO audit seeks to improve federal data accuracy [1]. These perspectives collectively document real incidents yet diverge on remedies and emphasis; journalists urge accountability, litigants demand redress, and auditors call for better metrics, revealing varied agendas that influence which facts are foregrounded.
7. Bottom line and what would be needed to produce an authoritative 2024 count
Based on the supplied material, there is no ICE-published total for “cases of mistaken identity” in 2024; only case reports, lawsuits, and a GAO finding about incomplete detention data exist [2] [3] [1]. Producing an authoritative count would require ICE to disclose standardized metrics on identity-error incidents and adjudication outcomes per GAO guidance, or for an independent audit to compile and verify records across detention facilities and watchlist matches—none of which were completed in the documents provided.
8. Practical next steps for someone seeking a numeric answer
To obtain a verifiable 2024 figure, request ICE’s case-level detention records and Red Notice/match adjudication logs under FOIA and compare them to GAO’s recommendations; pursue litigation or oversight inquiries that compel ICE to publish comprehensive detention metrics as urged by the GAO [1]. In the meantime, rely on documented individual cases to understand the scope and human impact: the sources show recurring wrongful-detention patterns without supplying a single agency-confirmed number for 2024 [2] [3] [5].