Do ICE officers receive cash bonuses for arresting or detaining immigrants?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
ICE and its parent DHS have publicly offered recruitment and signing bonuses of up to $50,000 for new or returning ICE officers and reimbursed pay to local partners — but available reporting also shows a separate, short‑lived internal proposal to pay small cash bonuses tied to fast deportations that was withdrawn after backlash (DHS/ICE advertises up to $50,000 signing bonuses; an internal memo proposed $200/$100 per quick deportation and was pulled) [1] [2].
1. What ICE officially pays agents and how bonuses are being advertised
The Department of Homeland Security and ICE have launched aggressive recruitment incentives — including signing bonuses advertised as “up to $50,000,” student loan repayment, overtime pay like LEAP/AUI and other retention pay — across official hiring pages and press releases as part of a major hiring push backed by new funding [1] [3] [4]. News outlets and federal press accounts reiterate the same topline: signing bonuses up to $50,000 for certain hires, plus traditional law‑enforcement overtime structures and availability pay [3] [5].
2. Distinguishing recruiting/retention bonuses from performance pay tied to arrests
There is a clear separation in reporting between (A) standard recruitment and retention incentives and (B) an internal proposal that would have directly rewarded speedy deportations. The public, official incentives are for hiring and retention (signing bonuses, loan relief, overtime), not per‑arrest bounties; the short‑lived internal plan that proposed $200 for deportations within seven days and $100 for deportations within 14 days was described in news reporting as an internal memo and was quickly withdrawn amid criticism [1] [2].
3. The withdrawn “speedy deportation” bonuses and the response
Reporting by outlets including WLRN and summaries of internal memos say ICE circulated a memo offering $200 per person deported within seven days and $100 for deportations within two weeks, intended to reduce backlog and detention costs; the program was pulled after public backlash and legal concerns [2] [6]. Coverage frames the move as a brief experiment rather than an established, ongoing pay structure and notes the agency rescinded it following scrutiny [2] [6].
4. How local and state law enforcement get paid for partnering with ICE
Separately, DHS has expanded reimbursement and incentive arrangements with state and local partners. For example, DHS/ICE announced reimbursements covering full salary and benefits and up to 25% overtime for eligible 287(g) officers and quarterly monetary “performance awards” to participating agencies tied to locating referred individuals (e.g., up to $1,000 per eligible officer under certain thresholds) — a structure that pays agencies or officers participating in formal partnerships rather than a per‑arrest individual bounty paid directly to ICE officers [7] [8]. Axios and DHS documents describe reimbursements and merit awards for agencies assisting ICE [7] [8].
5. Private contractors and “incentive‑based” solicitations
Investigations report ICE soliciting private contractors for locator work that contemplate “monetary bonuses” for performance metrics like correct address identification or locating a high percentage of targets; The Intercept highlighted a procurement seeking incentive‑based pricing structures for contractors tasked with skip‑tracing thousands of targets [9]. That suggests performance pay models have been floated outside the civil‑service pay system for contractors rather than routine cash‑per‑arrest pay for ICE officers [9].
6. Context: big funding increases and advocacy concerns
These pay proposals sit amid unprecedented funding and hiring drives for immigration enforcement: reporting and advocacy groups document large budget increases, billions earmarked for detention and deportation operations, and substantial sums set aside for hiring, signing and retention bonuses — raising concerns among critics about incentives to detain and deport more people [10] [11] [12]. Civil‑society reporting frames the fiscal context as creating incentive pressures on the system even where explicit per‑arrest pay is not institutionalized [12].
7. What the sources do and do not say
Available sources document official signing/retention bonuses up to $50,000 (DHS/ICE and multiple press outlets) and formal reimbursement/award schemes for partner agencies [1] [3] [8]. They also report a withdrawn internal ICE memo proposing $200/$100 payments tied to rapid deportations [2] [6]. Sources do not describe a sustained, agency‑wide, lawful program that permanently pays ICE officers cash per individual arrested or deported outside the recruitment/contractor contexts; if you ask whether ICE currently maintains an active, permanent “per‑arrest” bounty program for its employees, available sources do not mention a standing program beyond the withdrawn memo and contractor incentives [2] [9].
8. Bottom line for readers
ICE is publicly using large signing and retention bonuses and reimbursing partner agencies for participation; a separate, much smaller‑value scheme to reward very fast deportations was proposed internally and then pulled after public criticism [1] [2]. Reporting also shows ICE exploring contractor incentives to locate people — a different pathway for monetary rewards — and critics say the wider funding surge creates systemic incentives to detain and deport more people even without a permanent per‑arrest cash bounty [9] [12] [11].
Limitations: this analysis uses only the supplied reporting and government announcements; it does not include later internal ICE memos or personnel guidance not present in these sources.