Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: What is the format of the ICE polygraph test?

Checked on September 8, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, the specific format of the ICE polygraph test is not detailed in any of the sources. However, several key facts emerge about the current use of polygraph testing within the Department of Homeland Security and ICE:

  • DHS is actively administering polygraph tests to personnel to identify employees who may be leaking information about immigration operations to media outlets [1] [2] [3]
  • Secretary Kristi Noem has specifically directed that polygraph tests include questions about unauthorized communication with media outlets and non-profits [4]
  • The tests focus on asking employees specific questions about leaking classified documents or sensitive law enforcement information on ICE operations [2]
  • DHS already administers polygraph exams during the hiring process for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers and agents [4]

The only general format information available indicates that polygraph tests usually consist of three parts: a pre-test, the actual test with around a dozen questions, and a post-test [5], though this describes polygraph testing in general rather than the specific ICE format.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question seeks technical details about test format, but the analyses reveal significant missing context about the political and operational circumstances surrounding these polygraph tests:

  • The tests are part of a broader crackdown on leakers within DHS under the Trump administration's immigration enforcement policies [6] [4]
  • The polygraph testing represents an escalation in internal security measures beyond standard hiring procedures to ongoing employee monitoring [4] [7]
  • There are questions about the effectiveness of polygraph tests for leak detection, as noted in one source title referencing whether they actually work [5]

Alternative viewpoints that would benefit different parties:

  • DHS leadership and immigration enforcement advocates benefit from portraying polygraph testing as a necessary security measure to protect sensitive operations
  • Civil liberties organizations and employee rights groups would likely view this as an overreach that creates a climate of suspicion and potential violations of employee rights
  • Media organizations have a vested interest in protecting their sources and would oppose measures designed to identify leakers

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself does not contain misinformation, as it simply asks for factual information about test format. However, the question's narrow focus on technical format may inadvertently obscure the broader context of why these tests are being administered and their controversial nature.

The framing as a routine procedural question could minimize the significance of what appears to be an unprecedented use of polygraph testing for internal leak investigations rather than standard security clearance procedures [2]. This represents a notable shift in how DHS monitors its own personnel that extends beyond typical hiring protocols.

Want to dive deeper?
What are the consequences of failing an ICE polygraph test?
How does the ICE polygraph test differ from other law enforcement polygraph tests?
Can ICE applicants prepare for the polygraph test in advance?
What is the pass rate for the ICE polygraph test?
Are ICE polygraph test results admissible in court?