Have there been recent policy changes or incidents that prompted updates to weapon use or authorization for ICE agents and officers (2023–2025)?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
A formal overhaul of federal use-of-force rules in February 2023 at the Department of Homeland Security prompted corresponding, if opaque, policy moves inside ICE and spurred scrutiny of training and weapons authorizations through 2023–2025; reporting shows DHS sought tighter limits and more data collection while critics say ICE’s internal guidance and training continued to emphasize decisive use of force [1] [2] [3]. By 2024–2025 the debate shifted from doctrine to implementation — whether ICE actually changed how agents are armed, trained, and monitored — and new administrative steps in 2025 around expanded personnel authorities and surveillance tools widened concerns about broader weaponization and authorization beyond traditional firearms [4] [5].
1. DHS’s February 2023 use-of-force rewrite set the policy baseline
Following a May 2022 executive order, DHS issued an updated use-of-force policy in February 2023 that tightened some guardrails — for example restricting deadly force where the threat is only to property and requiring agencies to participate in FBI data collection on use-of-force incidents — and it explicitly required greater emphasis on de-escalation proficiency [2] [1]. Business Insider and The Trace both report that DHS’s 2023 policy is the central catalyst for subsequent ICE updates and public scrutiny, while noting that DHS’s changes mainly introduced new reporting obligations rather than radical operational restraints [1] [2].
2. ICE’s own 2023 policy and secrecy around internal changes raised alarms
ICE confirmed it created a new policy in 2023 that it said met or exceeded DHS standards, but the agency refused to publish the full text for public review, fueling criticism that internal practices remained unexamined even as doctrine shifted at the parent agency [1] [2]. Investigations into ICE training materials obtained by reporters found those materials still encouraged quick, decisive use of deadly force and devoted comparatively limited time to de‑escalation, suggesting a disconnect between written policy commitments and training emphasis [3] [6].
3. Training and handbook rules show continuing authorization and routine armament
Official ICE firearms and use-of-force handbooks (pre-2023) already allowed authorized officers to carry multiple handguns and required quarterly weapons qualification, and non-lethal options like expandable batons and pepper spray remained standard issue — institutional practices that reporters flagged as durable even as policy language evolved [7] [8]. That baseline explains why critics argue policy updates in 2023 were insufficient until training, oversight, and transparency changed to match them [6] [3].
4. Incidents from 2023–2024 kept pressure on policy implementation
High-profile fatal shootings and reporting on unprosecuted deadly-force cases in 2023–2024 kept the issue in the public eye and motivated calls for accountability; Business Insider and Type Investigations documented cases where agents fired in circumstances that critics say violated the spirit of the new DHS guidance, reinforcing demands that ICE publicly release its internal directive and reform training [1] [3]. Those incidents are central to why oversight groups and reporters continue to press for changes in authorization, supervision, and data transparency.
5. By 2025 the conversation expanded beyond guns to surveillance and new authorities
In 2025 the debate moved beyond mere firearm rules: reporting documents ICE’s interest in facial recognition apps and other surveillance capabilities and notes administrative decisions that broadened what counts as threats to agents, expanding potential justifications for defensive measures [5]. Separate 2025 policy shifts that delegated law-enforcement powers and firearm carriage to USCIS components — a delegation contested by critics — illustrate an authorization trend inside DHS that could enlarge who is armed and under what rules [4].
6. Bottom line: policy changes occurred, but implementation and transparency remain the problem
There were clear policy moves — DHS’s February 2023 use-of-force rewrite and ICE’s internal 2023 policy creation — and continuing incidents through 2024–2025 that kept pressure on weapon-use authorization and training [1] [2] [3]; however, reporting shows the central battle is not whether policy texts changed but whether ICE’s training, public release of internal directives, oversight, and expanding authorities (including surveillance tools and delegated armament to other DHS units) actually alter how and when agents use weapons in the field [1] [5] [4]. Publicly available sources reveal policy headlines but also notable gaps — ICE’s 2023 policy was not fully published for review — leaving important implementation questions unresolved [1] [2].