Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Illegal immigrant crime statistics vs United States Citizens
Executive Summary
Multiple recent analyses converge on a clear finding: immigrants, including undocumented individuals, are not driving higher crime rates and in many measures are less likely to be arrested, convicted, or incarcerated than U.S.-born people. National trend analysis shows that as the foreign-born share of the population rose from 6.2% in 1980 to 13.9% in 2022, the overall crime rate declined by about 60.4%, and researchers report no positive statistical link between immigrant share and crime rates [1]. State and academic studies reinforce this pattern with lower arrest and incarceration rates for immigrants, though results vary by offense type and methodology [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. What advocates and critics are claiming — boiled down to the essentials
Analyses presented here distill two core claims: first, that increased immigration correlates with lower or unchanged crime rates nationally and across many states; second, that immigrants — both legal and undocumented — commit fewer crimes or are arrested and incarcerated at lower rates than U.S.-born residents. The American Immigration Council frame emphasizes population-level trends from 1980–2022 showing a 60.4% drop in total crime as immigrant share rose, concluding no significant correlation between immigrant share and total crime in any state [1]. Complementary studies from Stanford and analyses of Texas data report substantially lower incarceration, arrest, and conviction rates for immigrants compared with native-born Americans [3] [4]. These claims appear consistently across the provided sources and dates.
2. National trends and big-picture evidence that challenges the “migrant crime wave” narrative
National-level work highlights a long-term decoupling of immigration and violent crime: as the immigrant population proportion rose, total crime fell sharply, and researchers found no statistically significant association between immigrant share and state-level crime rates [1]. Complementary syntheses conclude that immigration is associated with lower crime and improved neighborhood safety rather than increases in criminal activity [6]. These conclusions are supported by recent publications in 2024 and 2025 that consistently report the same direction of effect, indicating that claims of a surge in immigrant-driven crime lack empirical support in the analyzed datasets [1] [6].
3. State and institutional studies: Texas and Stanford findings that sharpen the picture
State-level analyses, notably of Texas Department of Public Safety data, show undocumented immigrants having lower felony arrest rates than native-born citizens — with U.S.-born residents more than twice as likely to be arrested for violent crimes and markedly more likely for drug and property crimes [4]. Stanford University research adds that since the 1960s immigrants have been about 60% less likely to be incarcerated than U.S.-born people [3]. These studies provide granularity — different offense categories, conviction vs. arrest vs. incarceration — and consistently indicate lower criminal justice involvement for immigrant groups in the examined datasets, reinforcing the national trend findings.
4. Methodological caveats and why different metrics can produce different impressions
Comparisons across arrest rates, conviction rates, and incarceration rates reveal important methodological differences that shape conclusions. Arrest data reflect policing practices and may be influenced by enforcement intensity; conviction and incarceration measures incorporate prosecutorial and judicial decisions; population denominators depend on survey-based estimates like the American Community Survey. For example, incarceration-rate comparisons show native-born Americans with an incarceration rate of 1,221 per 100,000 versus 613 for undocumented immigrants and 319 for legal immigrants in one analysis, a finding that underscores how metric choice affects the story told [5]. Researchers caution that differences in legal status, age structure, and selection effects among immigrant populations can partially explain lower observed criminality.
5. The political narratives and the evidence’s limits — spotting agendas and omissions
The body of evidence presented here pushes back on alarmist claims of an immigrant crime wave, but readers should note potential agenda-driven uses of these findings on both sides. Advocacy groups may highlight aggregate declines and safety gains to argue for more open immigration policy, while opponents may focus on isolated incidents or specific enforcement data to advocate restriction. The supplied analyses note consistent patterns but do not fully address heterogeneity by locality, time-period spikes for particular crimes, or enforcement biases that can affect arrest statistics. Transparency about data sources, date ranges, and the distinction between correlation and causation is crucial [1] [4].
6. Bottom line for policymakers and the public: what the evidence supports and what remains unsettled
Taken together, the available analyses indicate a robust pattern: immigration is not a primary driver of rising crime; immigrants are generally less involved in criminal justice contact than native-born Americans, across measures including arrests, convictions, and incarceration in several studies [1] [3] [5]. That pattern should inform policy discussions that weigh public safety alongside labor and humanitarian concerns. Remaining uncertainties include localized variation, the role of enforcement practices, and longer-term post-2023 trends; these warrant continued, transparent research using consistent metrics and clear reporting of dates and methods to avoid misinterpretation [6].