Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Immigrant crime rate
Executive Summary
Multiple peer-reviewed and government-linked studies converge on the finding that immigrants in the United States are, on average, less likely to commit crimes or be incarcerated than U.S.-born residents, with several analyses reporting roughly a 60% lower incarceration or offending rate among immigrants. This pattern appears consistently across long-term historical analyses, state-level studies, and syntheses by policy research organizations, though government enforcement data focusing on apprehensions and “criminal alien” arrests show recent increases in enforcement activity that do not, by themselves, demonstrate higher underlying immigrant crime rates [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6].
1. Why big-picture historical data tell a clear and repeated story about safety
Long-span demographic research finds that the immigrant population has not driven U.S. crime upward; instead, as immigrant shares grew from 1980 onward, total crime rates fell substantially. A Northwestern University study analyzing 150 years of U.S. Census and related records concluded immigrants were significantly less likely to be incarcerated than the U.S.-born, reporting about a 60% lower incarceration rate and noting that immigrants never exceeded natives’ incarceration rates over the period examined [1]. Complementary policy reviews and research syntheses, including work compiled by the American Immigration Council, document that between 1980 and 2022 the immigrant share rose while overall crime rates dropped roughly 60%, a broad empirical correlation that challenges narratives equating immigration with rising crime [3]. These long-term, aggregated findings provide context that individual agency enforcement spikes cannot erase.
2. Empirical studies at state and institutional levels reinforce lower offending rates
Multiple empirical investigations focusing on states and subsets of the immigrant population reinforce the national picture. An NIJ-funded analysis of Texas Department of Public Safety records reported that undocumented immigrants were arrested at less than half the rate of native-born citizens for violent and drug crimes and at about one-quarter the rate for property crimes, with no evidence of growth in undocumented offending from 2012–2018 [5]. Independent academic reviews and policy institutes also find immigrants substantially less likely to be incarcerated or convicted: studies cited by Stanford and the Cato Institute report immigrants and undocumented populations are markedly less likely to be incarcerated or convicted than U.S.-born peers [4]. These state-level and institutional studies provide convergent evidence across datasets and methodologies.
3. Government enforcement counts show more arrests but not necessarily higher crime prevalence
Federal enforcement statistics show a recent uptick in what agencies label “criminal alien” arrests and in certain enforcement actions; the Border Patrol’s criminal alien arrests rose in 2021–2022 compared with earlier years, and DHS publications document fluctuations in apprehensions, detentions, and removals tied to policy shifts and pandemic-era disruptions [6] [7] [8]. These enforcement-focused figures measure interactions with immigration control and policing, not baseline offending prevalence in immigrant communities; higher arrests can reflect changes in enforcement priorities, operational capacity, or border encounters rather than an underlying rise in immigrant crime. Analysts should therefore distinguish enforcement volumes from population-level offending rates when interpreting government tallies [6].
4. Where studies agree, where they differ, and what’s omitted from headlines
Across the provided research, there is agreement that immigrants commit fewer crimes than comparable U.S.-born populations, with most studies converging on roughly a 60% lower incarceration/offending metric [1] [2] [4]. Differences arise in scope and emphasis: some work centers on long-run historical trends [1], others on recent state data and undocumented populations [5], and government releases emphasize enforcement metrics without prevalence context [6]. Notably omitted from some public summaries are adjustments for age structure, labor market participation, selective migration bias, and enforcement-driven detection differences, all of which can materially affect measured rates. The body of evidence therefore supports the central claim but also highlights methodological caveats that matter for interpretation.
5. Practical implications for policy debate and public understanding
The preponderance of scholarship in these sources implies that policy discussions should not assume immigration increases crime; instead, evidence points to immigrants contributing to, or at least accompanying, lower crime rates [3] [2]. Policymakers relying on enforcement counts should transparently distinguish those statistics from prevalence studies and account for enforcement changes when designing public safety or immigration policy [6]. Finally, continued investment in high-quality, independent data—disaggregated by nativity, documentation status, age, and location—remains essential to refine understanding and avoid conflating enforcement trends with actual crime trends [1] [5].