How do intimate partner homicides compare to other leading causes of death for women globally?

Checked on December 8, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Intimate partner and family-member killings account for a striking share of female homicides: UNODC/UN Women estimate about 85,000 women were killed intentionally in 2023, and roughly 60% — about 51,100 — were killed by an intimate partner or family member, an average of roughly 137–140 victims per day [1] [2] [3]. Historical academic reviews show that more than one-third of female homicides are perpetrated by intimate partners, far higher than the comparable share for male victims [4] [5].

1. Intimate-partner femicide is a dominant form of women’s homicide

UNODC and UN Women’s recent joint estimates place intimate partner and family-member femicides at the center of lethal violence against women: in 2023 an estimated 85,000 women were killed intentionally and 60% of those deaths — about 51,100 — were by intimate partners or family members [1] [2]. Those figures mean one woman or girl is killed by a partner or family member almost every 10 minutes [2].

2. Regional patterns show big disparities

The risk and drivers vary sharply by region: the highest rate of intimate-partner/family-member femicide is estimated in Africa (about 3 per 100,000 women), followed by the Americas (1.5), Oceania (1.4), Asia (0.7) and Europe (0.5) [2]. Absolute numbers differ too — UN reporting highlights that Africa recorded the largest number of such deaths in 2024 [6] [1].

3. Women’s killing in the private sphere contrasts with male homicide patterns

Global homicide patterns are gendered: while about 80% of homicide victims are men, women’s homicides are disproportionately committed in the private sphere. UN sources report that intimate partners or family members committed about 60% of female homicides versus roughly 11–12% of male homicides [2] [7]. Academic reviews reach a similar conclusion: intimate partners account for a much larger share of female homicides than male ones [5] [4].

4. Longstanding research aligns with newer UN findings

A systematic review in The Lancet and related work found that at least one in seven homicides worldwide and more than a third of female homicides were perpetrated by intimate partners — a pattern the UNODC/UN Women reports reinforce with newer, higher-resolution estimates [4] [5]. The concordance between academic and UN analyses strengthens the case that intimate-partner femicide is both common and under-addressed [5] [1].

5. Measurement limits and data gaps weaken precision

UN reports and secondary sources warn data are incomplete: country reporting on femicide is uneven and the availability of relationship-disaggregated homicide data has declined in recent years, which complicates trend assessment and regional comparisons [3] [8]. UNODC/UN Women use modeling where country-level data are missing; the reports explicitly note limitations and call for better data collection [8] [9].

6. What this means for public health and prevention

The concentration of lethal violence against women in the domestic sphere implies prevention can be targeted: research and policy prescriptions include strengthening legislation, risk assessment in healthcare and policing, funding for survivors’ services, and broader measures to change gendered power dynamics [4] [1]. UN agencies argue femicides are preventable and urge urgent action on legal, funding and data fronts [1] [9].

7. Competing framings and potential agendas in reporting

UN reports foreground prevention and accountability, emphasizing state obligations and policy responses [1] [9]. Media summaries and some secondary aggregators amplify the daily-count framing (“137 a day” or “one every 10 minutes”) to mobilize attention; that framing is rooted in UN estimates but depends on modeling choices and available reporting [2] [3]. Independent academics emphasize methodological caution but arrive at similar qualitative conclusions [5] [4].

8. Bottom line for comparisons with other leading causes of women’s death

Available sources do not provide a direct, apples‑to‑apples ranking of intimate-partner femicide against all other leading causes of death for women (for example, maternal mortality, stroke, cancer) in a single comparable dataset; UN and WHO materials focus on the scale and share of homicides attributable to intimate partners and note the broader health impacts of intimate partner violence [1] [10]. What is clear from the available reporting is that a very large fraction of women’s homicides occur in the home and are perpetrated by partners or relatives, making intimate-partner femicide a distinct and urgent public-health and human-rights priority [1] [4].

Limitations: this analysis relies solely on the UNODC/UN Women reports and the cited systematic reviews; gaps remain where sources do not present direct cross-cause mortality comparisons or harmonized age-standardized rates across all causes [9] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What proportion of female homicides worldwide are committed by intimate partners?
How do intimate partner homicide rates vary by region and income level for women?
What age groups of women are most at risk of intimate partner homicide globally?
How have intimate partner homicide trends for women changed over the past two decades?
What prevention strategies have proven effective in reducing intimate partner homicides of women?