Have law enforcement agencies or prosecutors opened a criminal investigation linked to Virginia Giuffre's death?
Executive summary
Available reporting shows Western Australia police said Major Crime detectives are investigating Virginia Giuffre’s April 2025 death and that “early indications” are that the death is not suspicious; authorities were preparing a report for the coroner rather than announcing an active criminal prosecution [1] [2]. Her lawyer and family publicly described the death as suicide and urged the coroner’s process, while some relatives voiced suspicion — those differing perspectives appear in the record [3] [4].
1. What authorities have said: a police investigation, not a criminal charge
West Australia police repeatedly told news outlets that Major Crime detectives were investigating the circumstances of Giuffre’s death and that “early indication” from their work was that the death was not suspicious; the police said they would prepare material for the coroner rather than announce any criminal charges [1] [2]. Multiple outlets quote the same official phrasing, indicating an active police inquiry into circumstances rather than an opened criminal prosecution [1] [2].
2. Family and lawyer statements: suicide and the coroner’s role
Giuffre’s family and her Australia‑based lawyer publicly described her death as suicide and framed the coroner’s investigation as the proper avenue to establish cause and circumstance, with the lawyer saying the coroner “will determine in due course the cause of death” and that police would provide evidence to that process [3]. That public positioning stresses a medico‑legal procedure rather than a parallel criminal case being pursued at that time [3].
3. Contrasting voices: relatives expressing doubt
At least one family member was reported as expressing doubts about the circumstances, with a snippet in a compiled account saying her father later suggested “somebody got to her” — a view at odds with police "not suspicious" language and the statements of her lawyer [4]. Reporting therefore captures competing perspectives: official police assessment vs. family concerns [4] [3].
4. What investigators were preparing for the coroner
Reporting from The Guardian states that Major Crime detectives were preparing a report for the WA coroner and that the coroner’s court could not provide a timeframe for completion — again underscoring that investigators were compiling material for the coroner rather than announcing criminal charges or an ongoing prosecution [2]. This is a standard path in Australian sudden‑death cases where coronial inquest materials are collected by police [2].
5. No sourced reporting of an opened criminal prosecution in provided material
None of the supplied sources reports that law enforcement or prosecutors had opened a criminal investigation that led to charges or a criminal prosecution; the coverage consistently describes police inquiries and coroner processes, and public statements characterise the death as suicide with police saying it was “not suspicious” [1] [3] [2]. Available sources do not mention any indictment, arrest, or prosecutor‑led criminal case tied to her death [1] [2].
6. Context: why coronial reporting matters and how it differs from criminal probes
The accounts show authorities funneling investigative material to the coroner, which is a fact‑finding legal process focused on cause and circumstance of death; that is distinct from a criminal prosecution where police and prosecutors seek to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in court. The sources consistently characterise the work as preparatory for coronial determination, not as active criminal litigation [2] [1].
7. Limitations of the public record and areas of dispute
Reporting contains limitations: police statements that a death is “not suspicious” represent an early official view but do not preclude further developments; family members’ expressed doubts show disputed narratives; and the timeline for coroner findings was not provided in the available stories [1] [4] [2]. Available sources do not mention later prosecutorial decisions or criminal filings, so any assertion beyond what these outlets reported cannot be made from the supplied material [2].
8. Bottom line for readers
Based on the provided reporting, Western Australia Major Crime detectives investigated and prepared a report for the coroner, police described “early indications” as not suspicious, Giuffre’s lawyer and family described the death as suicide and deferred to the coroner, and at least some family members publicly questioned the circumstances — but the supplied sources do not report any opened criminal prosecution or charges tied to her death [1] [3] [2] [4].