Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Have any local law enforcement or child welfare agencies investigated claims of zip-tying children in ICE operations?
Executive Summary
Local and state child-welfare agencies and state officials have launched inquiries into claims that ICE agents zip-tied children during recent operations in Illinois and Idaho, while federal DHS/ICE officials have denied that children were zip-tied; reporting and advocacy groups documented eyewitness accounts and prompted state-level responses. The public record through October–November 2025 shows a mix of eyewitness claims, media investigations, and state directives to gather facts, but few publicly disclosed, completed local criminal investigations specifically charging federal agents for zip-tying children as of the latest reports [1] [2] [3].
1. Eyewitness Reports Sparked Outcry and Media Scrutiny
Multiple news outlets and local advocates reported eyewitness accounts alleging that federal immigration agents used zip ties or similar restraints on children during raids in Chicago’s South Shore and a family event in Wilder, Idaho, and these accounts were central to early coverage and community alarm. Independent fact-checking and local outlets noted that some images circulating online were miscaptioned or did not depict the events in question, yet eyewitnesses and resident statements persisted in describing children being restrained, which pushed state officials and civil-rights groups to demand reviews and document experiences [1] [4] [5]. The presence of advocacy groups such as the ACLU in Idaho and local coalitions in Chicago influenced what information was collected and publicized, indicating community-led documentation shaped the initial narrative [5] [4].
2. State Officials Ordered Child-Welfare Reviews — Not Always Criminal Probes
In Illinois, Governor J.B. Pritzker publicly directed the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services and the Department of Human Services to evaluate the treatment of children during the Chicago raid and to gather facts about whether formal actions were warranted, representing an administrative, child-welfare–oriented response rather than an immediate criminal indictment of federal agents [6] [2]. That state-level directive signaled official recognition that children were involved and initiated information-gathering by child-welfare agencies, but reporting indicates the state actions focused on welfare oversight and support for affected families rather than charging ICE personnel, and DHS/ICE spokespeople continued to contest claims about zip ties [6] [3].
3. Federal Denials and Differing Accounts Complicate Accountability
Federal sources and DHS/ICE spokespersons disputed allegations that children were zip-tied, saying children were not restrained in that manner, which created a contested factual landscape between eyewitnesses, advocacy groups, and federal officials. Media reports documented both statements from federal authorities denying zip-tying and contemporaneous community accounts alleging the practice, leaving investigators and the public to reconcile conflicting narratives [3] [4]. The absence of publicly released, independently verified photographic or documented chain-of-custody evidence linking federal agents to zip-tying in a way that led to criminal charges contributes to the gap between allegations and prosecutorial action in the available reporting [1] [7].
4. Local Law Enforcement’s Role Varied; some agencies coordinated, others were not the lead
Reporting indicates that some ICE operations involved multiple federal and state agencies, and in certain cases local law enforcement coordinated or were present; however, local police departments were not uniformly identified as initiating independent criminal investigations into zip-tying allegations. In Chicago, state agencies took the lead on welfare inquiries, and coverage stressed that local child-welfare authorities were the primary investigators for the children’s treatment, collecting statements and determining whether child-protective interventions were necessary, rather than local prosecutors immediately charging federal officers [2] [6] [7]. The differing jurisdictional roles—federal immigration enforcement versus state child-welfare mandates—help explain why criminal investigations by local law enforcement into federal conduct were not always evident in initial reports [4] [6].
5. What’s known, what remains unresolved, and where to watch next
As of the latest reporting through November 2025, there is clear evidence that state child-welfare agencies were asked to investigate treatment of children and that advocacy groups collected firsthand accounts; however, public records do not show widespread, concluded local criminal prosecutions charging ICE agents for zip-tying children. News outlets continued to publish new accounts and follow-ups, and some fact-checking corrected misattributed images while preserving eyewitness allegations that prompted official reviews, so the matter remains factually contested and under review by state agencies [1] [6] [3]. Monitor pending reports from DCFS/IDHS in Illinois, any formal findings from Idaho authorities or the ACLU’s documentation, and subsequent statements from DHS/ICE for conclusive determinations and potential legal referrals [5] [6] [3].