Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Can minors marry in Israel with parental consent or court approval?
Executive summary
Israel’s statutory minimum marriage age was raised to 18 in 2013, but narrow judicial exceptions remain: family courts can authorize marriages of minors older than 16 after interviewing them and (in some reporting) obtaining social‑worker recommendations [1] [2]. Reporting and NGO accounts document that clandestine child marriages still occur in some communities despite the legal change [3].
1. The legal baseline: 18 is now the minimum
The Knesset amended Israel’s Marriage Age Law in November 2013 to set the statutory minimum marriage age at 18; the amendment explicitly replaces earlier rules and frames any marriage of a person under 18 as requiring a court determination that marriage is in the minor’s interests and after the court has heard from the minor [1] [4]. Major English‑language reporting of the law’s passage described the change as raising the legal marriage age from 17 to 18 [4] [2].
2. The important caveat: family‑court exceptions for older teens
The 2013 amendment does not create an absolute bar for all under‑18s. Family courts retain power to recognize marriages for minors in “special cases,” but most sources say that such recognition applies only to applicants above the age of 16 and only after the court interviews the applicants and, in some accounts, receives a social‑worker recommendation [2] [1]. The Library of Congress notes the statutory test requires the court to determine the grant is in the minor’s interests and to hear from the minor before issuing a permit [1].
3. How older reporting complicates the picture
Older statutes and mid‑20th century reporting show a historic pattern of exceptions and variable rules — for example, earlier laws or proposals allowed younger girls to marry with parental consent or medical certification of maturity [5]. That historical context helps explain why community practices and legal debates persist even after 2013 reforms [5].
4. Enforcement and reality: reports of clandestine child marriages
NGO and news reporting say child marriages still occur “under the radar,” notably in some Haredi and Arab communities; Girls Not Brides cites a Knesset committee report that 716 child marriages took place between 2014 and 2015 with only a small number investigated, and recounts cases such as a 2017 arrest of a man about to marry a 14‑year‑old [3]. These sources suggest divergence between statutory law and social practice in some sectors [3].
5. Overlap with religious marriage systems
Israel’s marriage system is administered by religious authorities for most communities; that institutional structure affects how marriages are performed, recorded, and enforced. The country recognizes marriages performed by its religious courts and those performed abroad under civil rules, which means religious or private ceremonies can sometimes precede or complicate state registration processes [6] [7]. The Library of Congress report also cites Muslim and other religious leaders observing that faith practices may continue to allow marriage for minors despite the secular change [1].
6. Age of sexual consent and related criminal law — separate rules
Criminal laws on sexual consent and exploitation are distinct from marriage‑age rules: several reports place the age of consent for sexual activity at 16 and set criminal liabilities for sexual relations involving minors under various thresholds and in exploitative contexts [8] [9]. These different legal regimes can produce complex outcomes when marriage, sexual conduct, and guardianship intersect [8] [9].
7. What journalists and policymakers highlight
Advocates who pushed the 2013 law emphasized protecting young women and aligning with international norms; opponents in strictly Orthodox sectors warned of clashes with religious practices [4]. The Times of Israel and other outlets highlighted procedural safeguards the law added — interviews, social‑worker input, and annual ministerial reporting to the Knesset about exemptions and prosecutions — signaling the legislature’s intent to both restrict underage marriage and monitor exceptions [2].
8. Limitations and missing details in available reporting
Available sources establish the 2013 elevation to 18 and the family‑court exception for those older than 16 [1] [2], and document clandestine cases [3], but they do not provide full procedural rules for how courts routinely decide “in the interests of the minor,” the exact role of parental consent versus court approval post‑2013, or up‑to‑date central government statistics beyond the cited 2014–2015 period [1] [3]. For current court practice, recent statistics, or guidance on how to apply for a permit, available sources do not mention step‑by‑step procedures or 2024–2025 enforcement data.
Conclusion: The law now establishes 18 as the default minimum and requires family‑court authorization for under‑18s — practically limited to those over 16 in most accounts — but reporting and NGO documentation show exceptions and clandestine marriages continue in some communities, creating a gap between statutory rules and lived reality [1] [2] [3].