Have court filings or testimonies referenced Ivanka Trump in sexual abuse allegations against Donald Trump?

1. What the filings and testimony in the New York civil fraud trial actually cover

The materials and testimony cited in the supplied reporting focus on alleged financial misconduct: that Donald Trump and the Trump Organization overstated his wealth on financial statements used with banks, insurers and others, and that family executives were involved in business operations and communications about deals ^{[1] [3]}. Ivanka was initially a named defendant but an appeals court dismissed claims against her as time-barred; prosecutors nonetheless sought her testimony as a witness about documents, emails and deal negotiations tied to the alleged fraud scheme ^{[1] [4]}.

2. Why Ivanka was ordered to testify and what she said on the stand

Judge Arthur Engoron ruled Ivanka must appear after her lawyers attempted to quash subpoenas and argued she was beyond the court’s jurisdiction and no longer a party; the judge and later appellate orders required her testimony because prosecutors said she was a participant in events central to the case ^{[5] [6]}. When she testified, reporting shows her answers largely distanced her from details — frequently saying she did not recall specifics about loan-related documents and property deals — while prosecutors introduced emails and bookkeeping evidence showing her involvement in family business affairs ^{[2] [7] [3]}.

3. What the sources say about allegations of sexual abuse naming Ivanka

Available sources in the search results do not report court filings or witness testimony in this civil fraud trial that reference Ivanka Trump in sexual-abuse allegations. The coverage centers on financial records, loans, property valuations and family-company roles; none of the provided articles raise sexual-abuse claims involving Ivanka or cite filings that do ^{[2] [3] [1]}.

4. How to interpret absence of sexual-abuse references in these materials

The supplied articles consistently describe the scope of the New York AG’s case as civil fraud and related business practices; because these are the documents and witness transcripts being reported, their silence on sexual-abuse allegations suggests those specific claims are not part of the filings or testimony covered here ^{[1] [2]}. That does not prove such allegations do not exist elsewhere; it only reflects what these particular news reports and court filings presented to date ^{[2] [5]}.

5. Competing perspectives and potential motives in reporting and legal strategy

Prosecutors argued Ivanka’s testimony was necessary because she remained involved in organizational matters and financial arrangements; Ivanka’s legal team argued she should not be compelled to testify, citing jurisdictional limits, the appeal dismissing her as a defendant and practical hardship (school-week childcare) ^{[6] [8]}. Media outlets emphasize different facets: some focus on her “I don’t recall” answers and courtroom demeanor ^[7], others on documentary evidence showing her engagement with deals and internal communications ^[3]. Each side’s posture serves different interests — prosecutors seeking corroboration for a fraud narrative, defense counsel protecting a client’s legal exposure and public image ^{[1] [6]}.

6. Limitations in the available reporting and next steps for verification

These sources are limited to coverage of the civil fraud trial and Ivanka’s role as a witness; they do not include every subpoena, deposition or unrelated case where other allegations might appear. If you are looking for any mention of Ivanka in sexual-abuse allegations specifically, the available reporting does not mention that topic — to confirm more broadly, one would need to search other case dockets, criminal filings, or reporting beyond the provided set ^{[2] [1]}.

Summary: The supplied reporting documents Ivanka Trump’s compelled testimony about business practices and financial documents in a New York civil fraud case against Donald Trump; those filings and the testimony cited relate to alleged financial fraud, and the current sources do not report any sexual-abuse allegations naming Ivanka in those filings or testimony ^{[1] [2]}.