What is the publicly available court record for Jake Lang’s federal case (indictment, motions, plea or verdict documents)?

Checked on January 18, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Publicly available federal court records for Edward Jacob “Jake” Lang show an arrest, a sealed complaint and affidavit, a formal indictment, pretrial motions including a defense bail request and the government’s opposition, and docket entries reflecting interlocutory appeals and repeated trial delays; the record in the sources reviewed contains no finalized guilty plea or written verdict but multiple news accounts report a later presidential pardon that altered the case’s outcome [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6].

1. The charging instruments: complaint and indictment on the public docket

The Justice Department’s public case page lists a sealed complaint and an indictment charging Edward Jacob Lang with multiple counts arising from the January 6 attack; the DOJ site summarizes that Lang was arrested on 1/16/21, indicted on 1/29/21, and entered an initial not-guilty plea on 2/9/21, and links to the affidavit in support, complaint and indictment PDFs [2] [7].

2. Docket trail and sealed filings: what the CourtListener record shows

The CourtListener docket for United States v. Lang records early sealing motions and a SEALED COMPLAINT and affidavit, a motion to seal by the USA, Rule 5(c) transfer paperwork from SDNY, and entries for an interlocutory appeal and other procedural filings — confirming a public docket with many accessible entries but also with some documents kept under seal [1].

3. Pretrial motions visible in the public record: bail efforts and government opposition

Defense filings seeking Lang’s release appear in the public record — including a substantial Motion for Bail that asked for release to third‑party custody or supervised release so Lang could review discovery — and federal prosecutors’ formal opposition to that motion is available via DocumentCloud, indicating contested pretrial litigation over release and dangerousness [3] [4].

4. Status entries, delays, and the impact of related Supreme Court litigation

Court and local reporting document repeated continuances and status conferences: Lang’s trial date was moved multiple times, in part because of a Supreme Court challenge to the “obstruction of an official proceeding” charge that affected many January 6 defendants; local coverage notes the Supreme Court’s review and resulting delays in Lang’s case [8] [9] [10].

5. Plea, verdict, and post‑indictment disposition: what is—and is not—on the public record

The public record in these sources records an initial plea of not guilty [2] and ongoing pretrial litigation, but does not include a conviction judgment or a signed guilty plea document in the materials provided; separate news reporting and secondary compilations indicate Lang was later pardoned and spent years jailed awaiting trial, with some outlets saying the Department of Justice under a successor administration moved to dismiss or otherwise resolve related charges—assertions that require corroboration from a final court dismissal or clerk’s entry of judgment to be verified in the official docket [5] [6] [11]. The reviewed public docket snapshots and filings do not themselves contain a final verdict or sentencing entry, and several filings remained sealed or procedurally complex on record [1] [4].

Bottom line and limits of available documents

The publicly available federal court materials include arrest and charging documents (sealed complaint/affidavit and later indictment), a visible docket with motion practice and interlocutory appeals, and defense and government filings over bail and detention; the provided sources document a not‑guilty plea and extended pretrial status but do not include an accessible signed guilty plea or final verdict in the docket excerpts reviewed—while contemporaneous news reports assert a later presidential pardon that changed the case’s practical outcome, those assertions should be confirmed against the district court’s final docket entries or a clerk’s order for formal closure [2] [1] [5] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
Where on PACER or the DC district court site can one find the final docket entry or dismissal order for United States v. Edward Jacob Lang?
Which specific Supreme Court decision altered the use of the obstruction statute in January 6 cases, and which defendants’ appeals were directly affected?
What sealed filings remain in Lang’s docket and what procedures govern sealing and unsealing of January 6 related court documents?