Were there autopsy photos, reports, or investigators’ notes released in Jeffrey Epstein’s case?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Jeffrey Epstein’s death generated multiple official and unofficial forensic materials that have been disclosed in pieces over time: the New York City Medical Examiner’s autopsy report was completed and is referenced in oversight and DOJ records, the Office of Inspector General and the FBI reviewed and cited the autopsy in their probes, and at least some autopsy images have circulated publicly through family members and in later DOJ and congressional document releases — though releases are patchy and many materials remain redacted or withheld [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Competing interpretations persist: the medical examiner ruled suicide while privately retained experts and family members have highlighted autopsy photos and notes they say raise questions [2] [6] [5].
1. The official autopsy and agency reviews: what exists in government records
The City of New York Medical Examiner performed an autopsy on Epstein and produced an official autopsy report that has been reviewed by investigators; that report and the ME’s conclusion — that Epstein died by suicide — are cited in Department of Justice and oversight documents and in the Justice Department OIG’s investigation into Bureau of Prisons conduct [1] [2] [6]. The DOJ/OIG materials make clear the FBI examined the cause of death and concluded there was no criminality in how Epstein died, while the OIG’s work focused on prison staff supervision and custody failures [1].
2. Autopsy photos: private leaks, family disclosures, and later public file dumps
While the ME’s report is an established government document, photographic material from Epstein’s autopsy has not been released in a single, complete, unredacted government packet; instead, autopsy images have surfaced through other channels. Epstein’s brother and private forensic consultants have publicly cited and discussed autopsy photographs, and at least one autopsy photo was publicly referenced by family representatives in media interviews earlier on, which then fueled further reporting and debate [5]. More recently, the Justice Department and congressional Democrats released large batches of photographs and evidence from Epstein’s estate and investigatory files; those DOJ releases include images and make reference to the autopsy report being among the materials prepared for disclosure, though many files in the broader tranche were heavily redacted or withheld [7] [3] [4].
3. Investigators’ notes, FD‑302s and interview records: partially released, heavily redacted
The materials disclosed by the DOJ and in congressional releases encompass FBI evidence images, interview FD‑302s, witness interview notes, and other investigative records — but reporting across multiple outlets emphasizes that tens of thousands of pages were released in redacted form and that the Justice Department withheld additional documents despite statutory deadlines [7] [4] [8]. The OIG’s report explicitly states it reviewed FBI investigative records, including FD‑302s and interview notes, and that the OIG interviewed the Medical Examiner and reviewed the autopsy report as part of its custody-focused probe [1].
4. Conflicting readings and contested forensic opinions
Forensic disagreement is central to the public argument: Chief Medical Examiner Barbara Sampson stood “firmly” by the finding of suicide after her autopsy, a conclusion repeatedly cited in official documents [2] [6]. By contrast, private forensic pathologists retained by Epstein’s family, and family members themselves, have highlighted autopsy photos and details they say are inconsistent with suicide and therefore demand further scrutiny; these counterclaims have been publicized and reported on but do not overturn the ME’s official determination [2] [5] [6].
5. What the released files do — and do not — resolve
The DOJ’s staged releases and the House Democrats’ publication of estate photos have increased public access to images and investigatory materials connected to Epstein, and the DOJ documents explicitly include an autopsy report among the items being prepared for disclosure [3] [7]. Nevertheless, reporting underscores that many documents remain redacted or withheld, and that independent experts continue to dispute elements of the autopsy and scene interpretation; therefore, while autopsy reports and some related photos and investigator notes have been disclosed in fragments, the public record is incomplete and contested [4] [5] [1].