Was any medical or forensic examination of Jeffrey Epstein’s anatomy ever requested, filed with the court, or reported?

1. Autopsy done by New York City medical examiner and filed with authorities

New York City’s chief medical examiner, Dr. Barbara Sampson, performed a formal autopsy on Epstein’s body on August 11, 2019, and the autopsy findings were documented in a report that became part of the official DOJ/OCME materials published among the Epstein files ^{[4] [1]}.

2. DOJ and FBI reviewed and released post‑mortem materials, including images

The Justice Department and the FBI obtained and reviewed the autopsy report as part of their investigations; the DOJ later released an 89‑page post‑mortem report and several graphic post‑mortem photographs into the public Epstein files, and the FBI’s field report included images and descriptions from the post‑mortem examination ^{[1] [3]}.

3. Independent forensic observation and contested interpretations were reported

Epstein’s lawyers sent the high‑profile forensic pathologist Michael Baden to observe the OCME autopsy; Baden’s presence and the lawyers’ subsequent public dissatisfaction with the OCME finding were widely reported even as the OCME stood by its conclusion that Epstein died by hanging ^{[5] [6]}.

4. Oversight reviews and conclusions about criminality referenced the medical findings

Federal reviewers — including an FBI criminal inquiry and the Department of Justice Inspector General’s joint review with the FBI focusing on custodial conduct — examined the autopsy and related records; the FBI concluded no criminality in the cause of death, and the IG’s work incorporated the autopsy into a broader administrative investigation of jail procedures ^[2].

5. Autopsy details that fueled scrutiny and conspiracy theories were publicly reported

The post‑mortem record and released images described significant neck injuries and conjunctival hemorrhages noted by examiners, details that have been cited both by mainstream reporting and by skeptics to argue competing theories about the cause of death; those physical findings are recorded in the autopsy materials released by the DOJ and reported by multiple outlets ^{[7] [1]}.

6. What the public record does — and does not — show about additional forensic filings

The public record clearly shows an OCME autopsy report was prepared, reviewed by federal investigators, and included in DOJ releases, and that at least one independent pathologist observed the autopsy ^{[1] [5] [2]}. Claims of later, competing “new autopsies” or undisclosed medical filings remain assertions in media coverage or family statements (for example, Mark Epstein’s claim of forthcoming “more autopsy facts”) but are not substantiated in the cited official releases examined here ^[8]. Likewise, repeated public reporting and fact checks note that every credible official source — autopsy report, DOJ filings, federal inspector general review and FBI inquiry — converges on the established record rather than an absence of forensic examination ^{[9] [2]}.

Conclusion: direct answer to the question

Yes — a formal forensic autopsy of Jeffrey Epstein’s anatomy was requested and performed by the NYC Office of Chief Medical Examiner, the autopsy report and post‑mortem images were filed with and reviewed by federal authorities and included in DOJ releases, and independent forensic observation and subsequent agency reviews are part of the public record ^{[4] [1] [2]}. Disputes over interpretation of the autopsy’s findings exist — publicly reported by Epstein’s lawyers and private observers — but do not negate that the medical and forensic examinations were conducted and documented ^{[6] [5]}.