What assets of Epstein, including Zorro Ranch, were liquidated or retained during estate settlement?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The Epstein estate has systematically sold several of Jeffrey Epstein’s high‑value properties and used the proceeds to administer the estate and pay creditors, including victims, with the New Mexico Zorro Ranch sold in August 2023 to an entity called San Rafael Ranch LLC for an undisclosed price [1] [2] [3]. Sales of other major properties — including Palm Beach, a New York townhouse and the private islands — have also been reported, and the estate has funded a victims’ compensation program with proceeds from asset liquidations [4] [5] [6].
1. Major liquidations: which high‑value properties were sold
The estate has disposed of several marquee assets: Zorro Ranch in New Mexico was sold after being on the market for roughly two years (originally listed at $27.5 million), a Palm Beach property was sold in 2020 for nearly $26 million and later demolished, and a New York townhouse fetched about $50 million in 2021; additionally, Epstein’s private islands were reported sold in May for roughly $60 million combined — each sale reported as an undisclosed or negotiated amount that contributed to estate administration [5] [4] [6].
2. Zorro Ranch: the most scrutinized parcel and how it moved
Zorro Ranch, the roughly 8,000‑acre New Mexico property with a multi‑thousand‑square‑foot main house, airstrip and numerous outbuildings, was conveyed in August 2023 to San Rafael Ranch LLC with the deed recorded August 16; the estate’s attorney confirmed the sale but the purchase price remains confidential and the estate said the proceeds would be used to administer the estate and pay creditors, with a formal sales price to be disclosed in a quarterly accounting filed in the U.S. Virgin Islands probate court [1] [2] [3] [7].
3. Proceeds routed to estate administration and victim compensation
Court orders and estate statements make clear that liquidated assets are being used to fund estate administration and to satisfy claims, including a court‑approved Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program that the estate has funded with more than $140 million from asset sales, and estate valuations were pegged at roughly $210 million in earlier accountings — figures cited by estate counsel and real‑estate handlers as part of the liquidation rationale [6] [8] [9].
4. Legal entanglements, delays and contested titles that affected liquidation timing
Not all assets moved quickly: legal disputes and attempts to cloud or delay title — including a religious nonprofit’s claim tied to Zorro Ranch and even an alleged fake warranty deed — slowed liquidation in New Mexico and prompted scrutiny from the state attorney general; federal court oversight that ordered asset sales did not prevent local complications that delayed the transfer and raised questions about who might benefit from protracted skirmishes over title [10] [9] [11].
5. What the estate retained or what remains unknown
Public reporting documents multiple high‑profile sales but does not provide a comprehensive, line‑by‑line accounting of every retained asset or every sale price; the estate has stated it will disclose sales prices and accounting entries in periodic filings to the probate court in the U.S. Virgin Islands, so while large properties have been liquidated, a complete inventory of retained assets or unsold holdings is not fully available in the cited reporting and remains subject to the estate’s accounting disclosures [1] [2] [6].
6. Competing narratives and why transparency is imperfect
Estate representatives and court orders present a narrative of orderly liquidation to satisfy claimants and creditors, while local officials and reporters highlighted opacity, contested titles and slow pacing — for example, New Mexico officials questioned why Zorro Ranch took longer to clear than other Epstein properties — and the use of anonymous LLCs as purchasers has fueled public distrust even though confidentiality in estate sales is routine and the estate pledged eventual disclosure in court filings [10] [2] [7].