Who were the named trustees and executors of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate and what were their professional backgrounds?

Checked on February 2, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

will-and-estate">Jeffrey Epstein’s enduring legal paper trail shows a small core of professionals named to manage his posthumous affairs—his final, August 2019 will identifies longtime lawyer Darren Indyke and accountant Richard D. Kahn as the estate’s executors and the trust’s co‑trustees—while multiple earlier drafts and ancillary documents list a rotating cast of prominent financiers and advisers as alternate or successor executors, including Jes Staley, Larry Summers, Jimmy Cayne, Andrew Farkas, Kathryn Ruemmler and Boris Nikolic [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. Primary executors named in the will: Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn — who they are and why they matter

The last will signed days before Epstein’s death names Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as the estate executors; reporting and court exhibits describe Indyke as Epstein’s longtime personal lawyer and Kahn as his accountant, and both signed oaths confirming their willingness to serve [1] [5] [2]. Court exhibits filed in litigation in the U.S. Virgin Islands also list Indyke and Kahn as officers of companies tied to Epstein’s holdings, indicating they were embedded in the management of his entities as well as in estate administration [2]. Wealth‑management and legal reporting have repeatedly treated them as the operational stewards of the trust that holds Epstein’s assets [6].

2. Co‑trustees and estate roles: lawyer + accountant as structural choice

Epstein placed his assets into a trust in the will and designated the same two men—Indyke and Kahn—as co‑trustees, a structure that places legal and financial gatekeepers at the center of asset management and distributions [1] [6]. That pairing—one longtime lawyer and one long‑time accountant—matches standard estate practice for complex private trusts and also drew scrutiny from victims and prosecutors who later alleged mismanagement as the estate’s value shifted amid settlements and litigation [7] [6].

3. Successor and alternate executors named across earlier drafts: prominent financiers and advisers

Earlier and alternate versions of Epstein’s wills, made public in later document dumps, show a rotating list of high‑profile names that Epstein at various times considered as successor or alternate executors: Jes (James) Staley (linked to JPMorgan and later Barclays), former Treasury secretary Lawrence (Larry) Summers, former Bear Stearns CEO Jimmy Cayne, billionaire developer Andrew Farkas, and former Goldman counsel Kathryn Ruemmler are among those whose names appear in different drafts and backup positions [4] [3] [8]. Bloomberg and The New York Times reporting emphasize Staley’s history as a senior banking executive who had defended Epstein within JPMorgan and later appeared in other banks’ leadership narratives, while Summers is identified in filings as a one‑time Treasury secretary and academic [9] [4].

4. Boris Nikolic and others listed as successor or backup — science, philanthropy, and distance

The will also named Boris Nikolic, a biotech venture capitalist and sometime science adviser to Bill Gates, as a “successor executor” in some versions; Nikolic publicly said he was shocked to find his name and would not serve if called upon, illustrating how Epstein cultivated links to scientists and philanthropists who later sought distance [1] [5]. Reporting emphasizes that many named alternates either declined to participate, were listed in draft or earlier wills only, or later publicly denied active involvement with the estate [1] [4].

5. What the documents and reporting collectively show — and what they do not

Justice Department releases and court exhibits reveal a layered, evolving set of documents—final wills, drafts and corporate filings—that together show Indyke and Kahn as the executors/co‑trustees who actually signed on to manage Epstein’s estate, while other prominent figures appear as alternates in prior drafts or versions and in public scrutiny of Epstein’s network [2] [4] [3]. Reporting and exhibits establish professional backgrounds for those named—Indyke (lawyer), Kahn (accountant), Staley (senior banker), Summers (former Treasury secretary/academic), Cayne (Bear Stearns CEO), Farkas (real‑estate mogul), Ruemmler (former government lawyer/Goldman counsel) and Nikolic (biotech adviser)—but do not, in the provided sources, substantiate that all alternates ever accepted operative trustee or executor duties beyond being named in drafts [1] [4] [9] [5]. Claims about who benefited or how the trust was ultimately managed are the subject of litigation and review and exceed what the cited public filings and contemporary reporting alone can conclusively prove [6] [7].

Want to dive deeper?
What did court rulings and the U.S. Virgin Islands litigation conclude about alleged mismanagement of Epstein’s estate?
Which individuals named in Epstein’s various wills publicly denied involvement and what were their statements?
How much of Epstein’s reported net worth remained after settlements, taxes, and legal fees and who were the named beneficiaries?