Do Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs explicitly list Donald Trump and under what names or aliases?

1. Flight logs do list “Donald Trump” — and sometimes family members

The flight logs made public in different releases include entries that explicitly name Donald Trump and, in some instances, list Marla Maples and Tiffany Trump alongside him; People reported specific dated entries (Oct. 11, 1993; May 15, 1994) and said Trump appeared on multiple pages of the flight logs ^[3]. Local reporting synthesizing the logs counted multiple trips and concluded Trump flew on Epstein’s planes at least eight times in some compilations, while other reputable summaries report four Epstein-plane flights in the 1990s — the exact tally varies by dataset and the subset of logs used ^{[2] [1]}.

2. Names appear in different formats; pilots used initials and first names

The flight records were compiled by pilots and staff who sometimes used initials, first names, or shorthand for passengers, which means entries vary in form and clarity; the Palm Beach Post noted pilots’ practice of using mainly initials and first names in their notes, complicating simple tallies ^[2]. Public documents also include a redacted contact book and other lists, so researchers rely on cross-referencing dates, accompanying passenger lists and contextual emails to identify the people named ^{[4] [5]}.

3. Public releases came in stages and different batches

The material called the “Epstein files” consists of hundreds of gigabytes of evidence gathered by prosecutors; portions — including flight logs and a redacted contacts book — were released by the Department of Justice in phases, and later batches of emails and documents were posted by congressional committees and news organizations, producing overlapping but not always identical public record sets ^{[5] [4] [6]}. That staggered release pattern explains why different outlets report different numbers of logged flights and why some entries were highlighted at different times ^{[7] [6]}.

4. Journalistic accounts present slightly different counts and emphases

Forbes and other outlets summarized the flight logs as showing Trump flew on Epstein planes multiple times in 1993 and other 1990s dates (Forbes said four times) while the Palm Beach Post reported “at least eight” flights in its review; People magazine described specific pages and dates in the DOJ release showing Trump and family members on flights ^{[1] [2] [3]}. These differences stem from which log documents each reporter used, whether later releases were included, and how ambiguous shorthand entries were interpreted ^{[2] [4]}.

5. Presence on a log is not, by itself, an allegation of crime

News outlets and official statements accompanying releases emphasized that a name on a flight log does not, in itself, indicate wrongdoing; many passengers used Epstein’s planes for legitimate business or social reasons, and reporting has repeatedly cautioned against conflating presence on a manifest with criminal conduct ^{[3] [8]}. Republican and Democratic actors have disputed the political framing of releases, with GOP sources arguing Democrats used documents to attack Trump and Democrats arguing for full transparency ^{[8] [6]}.

6. Context from related emails and records complicates the narrative

Later batches of documents included emails in which Epstein and associates discussed Trump’s travel and whereabouts, and those emails became part of political debate about what the files prove or do not prove; the New York Times and the Guardian highlighted messages in a November release showing Epstein tracked Trump’s movements and discussed him, while also noting partisan disputes over the significance of those items ^{[6] [9]}. The house passage of transparency legislation and continued public releases mean the documentary record remains dynamic ^[10].

7. What these sources do and do not show

Available reporting clearly documents Trump’s name appearing in flight logs and related Epstein files and records that Trump flew on Epstein-associated planes in the 1990s and possibly other occasions; exact counts differ across news reconstructions ^{[3] [1] [2]}. The provided sources do not present a single, consolidated, authoritative roster resolving every shorthand entry across all log batches; they do not establish criminal culpability from the mere presence of a name on logs ^{[4] [3]}.

Limitations: this analysis relies solely on the provided reporting and document summaries; full primary flight-log images and every released page are not reproduced here, and the sources themselves describe phased and redacted releases that produce differing tallies ^{[4] [5]}.