Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Were high-profile names included in Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs and were they verified?
Executive summary
Flight logs from Jeffrey Epstein’s aircraft — long circulated in court filings and media reporting — do include many high‑profile names such as Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Prince Andrew and other public figures (see released logs and archived copies) [1] [2] [3]. Pilots and documents entered at trials add context that names appear in handwritten logs but do not by themselves prove wrongdoing; verification of identity or activity varies across sources and was sometimes contested or redacted in official releases [4] [5] [6].
1. What the flight logs show and where they came from
Multiple sets of Epstein flight logs have been produced in litigation and government releases and are publicly available in archive and DOJ batches; they list dates, tail numbers and passenger names or initials for flights between the 1990s and mid‑2000s [1] [6]. Media outlets and court exhibits reported familiar names recurring in those pages, and some compilations posted online reproduce the handwritten entries as scanned PDFs [4] [7].
2. Which high‑profile names appear in the records
High‑profile names reported in the logs include former presidents and celebrities such as Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, royals like Prince Andrew, and public figures including Naomi Campbell, Kevin Spacey, Alan Dershowitz and others — these identifications are visible in the released and archived logs and in reporting that accompanied DOJ document releases [2] [8] [3]. News coverage of the DOJ packet published in 2025 also lists similar names drawn from the flight logs and an Epstein contact book [6] [2].
3. What “appears in the logs” actually means
Entries in handwritten flight logs can be full names, initials, nicknames or generic notes (e.g., “one female”), and pilots testified that they sometimes recorded only what they were told — meaning a name on a page documents presence on a flight manifest or pilot’s notebook, not an independent biometric or identity check [4]. LawAndCrime reported pilot testimony at the Maxwell trial explaining how names and shorthand were recorded and that some pages were signed by the pilot responsible for those entries [4].
4. Verification limits — presence ≠ culpability
Reporting and archived records show names in logs, but inclusion alone does not establish criminal conduct or explain the purpose of a trip; several outlets and official statements have cautioned that a log entry does not imply participation in criminal acts [4] [8]. Some public figures named in logs have issued denials or contextual explanations in prior reporting; for example, Clinton’s spokesperson stated he had not spoken to Epstein in years and denied visiting certain properties, a point noted in media summaries [8]. Available sources do not mention exhaustive, independent verification steps such as cross‑referencing travel itineraries, passenger IDs or corroborating testimonies for every name listed.
5. Disputes, redactions and selective releases
Government and private releases have differed in scope and redaction. The DOJ’s February 2025 release provided over 100 pages including flight logs and a redacted contact book, but earlier court cases produced partly unsealed logs and evidence exhibits that varied in detail and editing [6] [4]. Some reporting emphasizes that versions of the logs have been public for years while other batches were newly disclosed, creating uneven availability and fueling scrutiny about what was withheld or revealed [9] [6].
6. How journalists and researchers treat these records
News organizations and archives reproduce the logs so readers can see entries; many outlets explicitly note the difference between a recorded name and proof of wrongdoing and include pilot testimony or official statements for context [4] [3]. At the same time, partisan or rumor‑driven sites have at times amplified lists without full context — readers and researchers should prioritize scanned primary documents and reputable reporting that cite pilot testimony or DOJ documentation [1] [4].
7. Bottom line for readers seeking truth and verification
The flight logs do list many well‑known names and have been used as evidence in trials and in DOJ releases [1] [6]. However, available reporting shows limits to verification: handwritten entries document claimed passengers but do not by themselves confirm identity beyond what the pilot recorded, nor do they establish criminal conduct; supplemental evidence and testimony are necessary to move from presence on a manifest to proven wrongdoing [4] [8].