Who were Epstein’s known associates and what roles did they allegedly play in the sex trafficking ring?

Checked on February 4, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking enterprise, as described in decades of reporting and court filings, relied on a network of recruiters, household employees, modeling intermediaries and wealthy associates who prosecutors and victims say helped procure, transport, and conceal underage girls for sexual abuse [1] [2] [3]. The clearest criminal findings focus on Ghislaine Maxwell’s role in recruiting and managing victims, while other named figures range from on-the-ground facilitators whose conduct is alleged by victims to powerful men whose inclusion in documents has not uniformly led to criminal charges [1] [2] [4].

1. Ghislaine Maxwell — the convicted recruiter and organizer

Ghislaine Maxwell is the central, convicted associate identified by prosecutors as a recruiter and facilitator who procured underage girls for Epstein, helped arrange encounters at his homes, and was found guilty in 2021 of federal sex‑trafficking and conspiracy charges and sentenced to prison [1] [5]. Victim testimony and court filings in civil and criminal proceedings portray Maxwell as Epstein’s long‑time confidante who introduced girls to him and managed aspects of the scheme, a role the government relied upon in securing her conviction [1] [6].

2. Household staff and schedulers — the alleged day‑to‑day enablers

Federal prosecution memoranda and investigative reporting identify several employees and household figures alleged to have scheduled “massage” appointments, contacted victims, and escorted girls into rooms where abuse occurred, with prosecutors noting unnamed staff explicitly facilitated exploitation in New York and Florida [2] [7]. Reports name Lesley Groff, Epstein’s former executive assistant, among those repeatedly mentioned by victims and investigators as arranging appointments and logistics, though many employees remain unindicted in the public record [2].

3. The Kellen figure and photographic evidence allegations

Court documents and reporting refer to a woman identified in filings as “Kellen” (commonly reported as Sarah Kellen) who allegedly lived in Epstein’s Palm Beach house, arranged meetings for women to give massages, escorted girls to encounters with Epstein, and purportedly photographed victims, allegations that appear in victims’ accounts and partially redacted files [8]. These operational allegations form part of prosecutors’ portrayal of a coordinated trafficking enterprise in which multiple helpers handled recruitment, documentation, payment and movement of victims [8] [3].

4. Modeling scouts and fashion intermediaries — Jean‑Luc Brunel and the talent pipeline

Investigations and reporting connect French modeling agent Jean‑Luc Brunel to Epstein through modeling networks and emails; Brunel was arrested in France on allegations including trafficking and died in custody while awaiting trial, and documents and survivor accounts suggest modeling promises were sometimes used to groom and funnel young women into Epstein’s circle [9] [10]. Journalistic reconstructions and court files describe how promises of careers or introductions to industry figures became recruitment tools, implicating modeling intermediaries in the broader system of exploitation [11] [10].

5. Wealthy associates, alleged clients, and the limits of inclusion in files

Court records and massive document releases name numerous prominent men as associates or contacts of Epstein — including Les Wexner, Prince Andrew (who later settled a civil claim), and others like Leon Black and Jes Staley who have been the subject of allegations or civil claims — but inclusion in files does not equate to criminal culpability and several named figures have denied wrongdoing or reached private settlements [12] [7] [2] [4]. Survivors’ attorneys argue the operation supplied girls to other wealthy individuals, yet prosecutors and some public officials have warned that the presence of a name in the trove of documents is not itself proof of participation in trafficking, creating a persistent tension between victims’ demands for accountability and legal standards of proof [4] [9].

6. Aftermath, prosecutions, and remaining investigative gaps

The government’s unsealed memoranda, civil filings and the release of millions of documents have produced detailed allegations about facilitators and hinted at possible third‑party involvement, prompting calls for further investigations and litigation, but many targets remain uncharged and large swaths of the files are redacted or ambiguous, leaving factual disputes unresolved in the public record [4] [9] [2]. Reporting across major outlets and legal analyses converges on a core picture—Maxwell’s conviction and multiple credible victim accounts establish that Epstein operated a trafficking operation assisted by recruiters and employees—while continuing disclosures and litigation are the primary avenues for clarifying which other associates may face accountability [1] [3] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
Which former Epstein employees have been publicly named as potential co‑conspirators and what is their current legal status?
What evidence and legal arguments did prosecutors use to convict Ghislaine Maxwell in 2021?
How have civil settlements and document releases shaped public knowledge about third‑party involvement in Epstein’s network?