What activities or connections did Epstein have in Ohio during his lifetime?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Jeffrey Epstein had repeated, well-documented ties to central Ohio through his long business and personal relationship with billionaire Les Wexner: Epstein served as a Wexner financial manager, was a director or officer on Wexner-related entities, owned a New Albany house and land, and participated in development projects there; Ohio institutions later found modest direct donations from Epstein but many records show deeper informal involvement [1] [2] [3] [4]. Public releases of Epstein estate materials and congressional document dumps in 2025 renewed scrutiny of those Ohio connections, including a birthday album page from Wexner and references to New Albany in Ghislaine Maxwell testimony [5] [6] [2].
1. Epicenter: New Albany — Epstein’s Ohio real estate and development role
Reporting and business records show Epstein owned land and a house in New Albany, Ohio, and was identified as a president of The New Albany Company alongside Les Wexner in the late 1990s; Epstein sold a King George Drive house to the Wexners for $0 in 2007, and local reporting says he “ran New Albany” in the sense of having operational and ownership roles in that development [2] [3] [7] [8].
2. Financial manager to Ohio’s richest man — Epstein’s role in the Wexner orbit
Multiple outlets document that Epstein became Les Wexner’s personal financial manager and adviser in the late 1980s and 1990s; Epstein was a director of Wexner foundations and president of Wexner property companies, and emails and leaked documents portray him operating inside the Wexner family’s financial office and influencing philanthropic and property decisions [1] [9] [8].
3. Payments, donations and university ties — what Ohio institutions found
Ohio State University’s independent review identified $336,000 in donations and pledges linked to Epstein and the J. Epstein Foundation; OSU says those gifts were retained out of step with its values and redirected to anti‑trafficking work, and the school stated it found no real‑estate or investment transactions directly with Epstein in its review [4]. Other reporting links Epstein funds to projects where the Wexners’ names appear, prompting scrutiny over origin and influence [10] [4].
4. Testimony and allegations — claims about sexual misconduct in Ohio
Court affidavits and reporting have cited allegations that at least one sexual assault by Epstein occurred in an Ohio mansion within a complex developed by Wexner; Maria Farmer’s allegations and related civil filings have focused on New Albany properties and events alleged to have taken place there [3] [11] [12]. Available sources do not mention conclusive criminal charges in Ohio tied to Epstein’s activities there; the sources report allegations, depositions, and survivor statements [3] [13].
5. Maxwell interviews and congressional releases amplified local links
Ghislaine Maxwell’s interviews with DOJ and the release of materials by the House Oversight Committee in 2025 explicitly reference Epstein’s New Albany role and his close relationship with Wexner; Maxwell said Epstein “ran New Albany” and that he owned land amid Wexner holdings — statements now part of the public record used by Ohio reporters and investigators [2] [5] [14].
6. Public artifacts and optics — the birthday book and other documents
Documents released from Epstein’s estate — including a 50th‑birthday album compiled by Maxwell — contain a greeting and drawings from Leslie Wexner and other entries that put Ohio names in widely circulated material, intensifying political and media attention on Ohio figures and prompting denials and legal pushback from some named public figures [5] [15].
7. Local political reverberations and demand for transparency
Ohio lawmakers and the state’s congressional delegation have engaged with the national push to release the Epstein files; multiple Ohio members supported public disclosure of records and local activists have pressured Wexner and institutions such as Ohio State to account for ties and donations — a political dynamic driven by the newly released documents [16] [17] [18].
8. How to read the record — confirmed facts vs. contested claims
Confirmed facts in public records: Epstein owned property in New Albany, held official roles in Wexner entities, and donated monies or was linked to funds later reviewed by Ohio institutions [2] [1] [4]. Contested or alleged matters — sexual assaults at Ohio properties and the depth of Wexner’s knowledge about Epstein’s crimes — appear in affidavits, survivor testimony, and civil suits but remain disputed in reporting and legal filings [3] [11] [13]. Available sources do not mention definitive criminal prosecutions in Ohio based solely on these local allegations [3] [11].
Limitations: this summary relies only on the supplied reporting and released documents; it does not attempt to adjudicate contested testimony or evidence beyond those sources.