What is the location of Jeffrey Epstein's private island?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, Jeffrey Epstein's private island is definitively located in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The island is specifically named Little St. James [1] [2] [3] [4]. More precise geographical details indicate that Little St. James is situated approximately 2 miles off the coast of St. Thomas, which is the second-largest island in the U.S. Virgin Islands [1] [3].
The sources also reveal that Epstein owned additional property in the area, specifically Greater Saint James island, also located in the U.S. Virgin Islands [2]. This indicates that Epstein's Caribbean holdings were more extensive than just a single island.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question focuses solely on the geographical location but omits significant criminal context that is intrinsically linked to the island's notoriety. Multiple sources confirm that Little St. James was the site where Epstein was accused of transporting underage girls [4]. This criminal activity is what made the island internationally infamous, not merely its location.
The analyses also reveal the existence of substantial evidence related to the island's operations, including island blueprints and logs that could provide insight into activities that occurred there [2]. This suggests that the island's significance extends far beyond its geographical coordinates to include its role as a documented crime scene in federal investigations.
Additionally, the question doesn't acknowledge that the island has been the subject of ongoing legal proceedings and government evidence collection, making it a key piece of evidence in understanding Epstein's criminal network rather than simply a private retreat.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question itself does not contain misinformation, as it asks a straightforward factual question about location. However, the framing is notably sanitized, referring to it simply as "Jeffrey Epstein's private island" without acknowledging its criminal significance. This neutral framing could inadvertently minimize the serious criminal activities that allegedly took place there.
The question's simplicity might also deflect attention from the more substantive issues surrounding the island, such as the unreleased government files and evidence that remain sealed [4] [2]. By focusing solely on location, it avoids addressing the ongoing legal and investigative questions surrounding what occurred on the island and who may have been involved.