What are the dimensions and acreage of the house and property on epstein's private island?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Reporting on Little Saint James — the private island long associated with Jeffrey Epstein — yields consistent confirmation that the island’s land area is "around 70–90 acres" depending on source, while reliable published reporting does not provide a verified square‑foot dimension for Epstein’s primary house or full compound footprint; instead, journalists and officials describe a main villa, multiple guest cottages and ancillary structures without offering precise building dimensions [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Acreage: the established range and why sources differ
Major outlets and reference pages list Little Saint James’s total acreage variously as roughly 70–78 acres (often rounded to 70, 71, 72 or “70‑plus”), while a smaller set of reports and summaries have cited a 90‑acre figure; for example, Wikipedia and multiple news stories place the island at 70–78 acres or “around 70 acres” [1] [5], Business Insider and other outlets repeat a 72‑acre figure [3], local reporting and property listings sometimes show 71.6 acres [4], whereas BBC and at least one BBC business summary referenced “90 acres” in some coverage [2] [6]. These differences reflect rounding, varying measurement methods, inconsistent use of cadastral parcel totals versus combined nearby holdings, and media shorthand when reporting decades of property transactions [1] [6].
2. The house and compound: what reporting documents and what it doesn’t
Photographs and video released by the House Oversight Committee and referenced by CNN and PBS show interiors and exteriors of the main compound but do not include authenticated architectural plans or a stated square footage for Epstein’s primary residence, meaning contemporaneous reporting documents rooms and features (bedrooms, a colonnaded villa, cabanas, guest cottages) rather than supplying measured dimensions of the principal house [7] [1] [8]. Multiple outlets describe a “main residential compound and four guest villas,” cabanas, a helipad, pools and other amenities, but none of the provided sources furnishes a verified footprint or internal square‑foot number for the main house [9] [1] [5].
3. Structures and features widely reported on the island
Contemporary coverage catalogs a built compound: a colonnaded villa–style main house (renovation by architect Edward Tuttle), several guest cottages, staff/caretaker housing, a helipad, dock, pools, multiple beaches, a gym and specialist rooms depicted in released photos (a dentist‑like chair, masks on walls), and plans once proposed for an amphitheatre and an “underwater office & pool” on the neighboring Great Saint James — reporting that conveys the compound’s complexity though stops short of exact building measurements [1] [9] [10] [11].
4. Property ownership, sale listings and their figures
Real‑estate listings and later sale coverage commonly bundle Little St. James with neighboring Great St. James, producing combined acreage statements (for example Forbes and other outlets cited combined listings of “70‑plus” and “160‑plus” acres respectively for each island) and a combined asking price that complicated single‑island descriptions; the 2023 sale reporting emphasized the islands as a package, which is one reason some summaries trumpet larger acreage totals when describing Epstein’s former holdings [12] [10] [5].
5. Reconciling the reporting: best single answer and limits of public record
The most defensible summary from the provided reporting is that Little Saint James itself is broadly reported at roughly 70–76 acres (commonly cited as 70, 71, 71.6 or 72 acres) with some high‑level outlets at times using a rounded “90‑acre” figure or conflating nearby parcel totals [1] [4] [3] [2]. No source among the supplied reporting provides a verified square‑foot dimension or exact measured dimensions for Epstein’s main house or the total built footprint on Little Saint James, and this gap should be acknowledged rather than filled with inference [7] [8].
6. What this means for researchers and why transparency matters
Public documents released by congressional investigators and property sales paperwork have improved the visual and transactional record — images, videos and parcel sales are cited in Houses’ releases and press coverage — but the absence of publicly posted architectural plans or a single authoritative land survey in the articles supplied means precise building dimensions remain unknown to reporters; researchers seeking exact measurements will need to consult cadastral surveys, permitting records from the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources, or estate sale documents not provided here [8] [10].