Who else flew on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet according to flight logs?

1. What the records actually claim — clear names and plain facts

The flight logs and related unsealed documents list numerous passengers by name and by coded entries; confirmed names repeatedly cited across releases and media summaries include Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, George Mitchell, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Naomi Campbell, Bill Gates, and several Epstein associates such as Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Kellen ^{[1] [6] [3]}. DocumentCloud’s release of the USA v. Maxwell exhibits contains passenger manifests covering many flights between roughly 1991 and 2006, and those manifests were entered into evidence and cited during the Maxwell trial, giving the lists evidentiary status within that proceeding ^[2]. Multiple reporting projects cross-checked the PDF manifests against known travel dates and public statements; these cross-references reveal repeated appearances by some individuals while others appear only once or on ancillary documents ^{[7] [1]}.

2. Disagreements and gaps — why lists differ across outlets

Different outlets and document releases produce non-identical lists because they rely on distinct sources: some use flight manifests from the Maxwell prosecution, others use pilot Larry Visoski’s testimony, and others compile press reporting and civil discovery documents; each source has different scope and redactions ^{[2] [4]}. Some datasets exclude private or redacted “J. Doe” entries and explicitly omit names of minors or alleged victims for legal and privacy reasons, producing shorter public lists; other compilations include a wider set of names pulled from civil unsealing, which yields more comprehensive but less uniformly vetted rosters ^{[5] [7]}. The result is that no single public source provides a definitive, uncontroversial master list, and responsible reporting treats names in manifests as factual travel entries while noting what those entries do and do not prove ^{[1] [3]}.

3. Context matters — presence on a flight is not a charge

Legal filings and reporting stress the important caveat that being listed on a flight manifest is not an accusation of criminality; many listed figures have publicly explained the context of their travel, or the records show limited, routine trips connected to philanthropy, political activities, or social events ^{[3] [4]}. Pilot testimony at the Maxwell trial, for example, described routine flights and denied seeing illicit activity onboard, while acknowledging that manifests and logs reflect who boarded the plane—not what occurred during flights ^[4]. Courts and journalists repeatedly separate factual manifest inclusion from allegations of abuse; several named individuals have denied any involvement in Epstein’s criminal conduct and some have cooperated with investigators as witnesses rather than suspects ^[5].

4. Conflicting accounts and legal outcomes — settlements and denials

Some high-profile relationships ended in lawsuits or settlements that altered public perception: Prince Andrew settled a civil suit with Virginia Giuffre in 2022, a legal resolution that included a financial settlement but no criminal conviction, while other named individuals have faced no legal action tied directly to the flight logs ^[3]. Civil settlements and public denials create complex legal and reputational outcomes: settlements often resolve claims without admissions of wrongdoing and thus complicate a straightforward reading of flight manifests as proof of criminal conduct ^{[3] [5]}. Journalistic accounts and court documents from 2021–2024 show repeated emphasis on that distinction and on ongoing differences between civil claims, criminal cases, and testimonial evidence ^{[1] [5]}.

5. How journalists and researchers verified names — methods and limits

Investigations used a combination of the Maxwell trial exhibits, pilot testimony, civil discovery, and public scheduling data to corroborate flights; projects that aggregated names cross-checked flight dates with public calendars, airport logs, and contemporaneous reporting to reduce false attributions ^{[2] [7]}. Nonetheless, researchers caution about transcription errors, similar names, and redactions that leave some entries ambiguous, so verified compilations still carry margins of uncertainty; credible reporting flags those uncertainties and cites the primary documents used for each claimed appearance ^{[2] [4]}. Readers should prioritize original court exhibits and contemporaneous trial records when possible and note that later secondary lists may introduce or propagate errors if not tied to those core sources ^[2].

6. Bottom line and where to look next for primary evidence

The flight logs provide a documentary record of who boarded Epstein’s aircraft at specific times and places, and multiple mainstream outlets and the DocumentCloud release used in Maxwell’s trial are the most direct public sources for those manifests ^{[2] [1]}. Interpreting those entries requires cross-referencing pilot testimony, sworn statements, settlements, and denials to distinguish travel facts from allegations of criminal conduct ^{[4] [3]}. For primary-source verification consult the court exhibit PDFs and DocumentCloud releases cited during the Maxwell prosecution and seek contemporaneous reporting dated near those releases to understand how courts and journalists treated each named appearance ^{[2] [5]}.