What specific nondisclosure agreements were used in Jeffrey Epstein settlements and when were they signed (year)?

1. What the document dumps reveal — quantity, not itemized NDAs

Congressional and media releases in 2025 emphasize volume: the House Oversight Committee disclosed tens of thousands of pages from Epstein’s estate and DOJ holdings — described as over 20,000 pages in one release and over 33,000 in another tranche — but the reporting focuses on flight logs, email exchanges, call logs and the Acosta interview rather than enumerating every settlement agreement or NDA by name and date ^{[4] [2] [3]}.

2. Where reporting discusses settlements and secrecy, not the precise contracts

News outlets note that Epstein “paid settlements to victims” and that his controversial 2008 plea deal led to registration as a sex offender, but those articles do not reproduce or summarise a list of specific nondisclosure agreements or their execution years; coverage concentrates on records such as flight manifests and transcripts and on political fallout from the releases ^{[5] [3] [6]}.

3. Legal context: NDAs used in sexual-abuse settlements — general principles

Legal commentary in the materials explains how NDAs have been used to keep abuse allegations confidential and also how many experts and advocates challenge their enforceability where they would cover criminal conduct; that commentary cites broader patterns — including Epstein’s case as an example — but does not serve as primary documentation of the individual NDAs, signatories, or signing dates ^{[7] [8]}.

4. What congressional activity is targeting the records and secrecy

Legislative efforts aim to force transparency. The Epstein Files Transparency Act and related House resolutions seek to compel release of flight logs, immunity deals, plea bargains and sealed settlements — indicating lawmakers want to surface NDAs and sealed settlement paperwork — but the legislative text and resolutions themselves do not list the specific confidentiality agreements or the years they were signed ^{[9] [10] [11]}.

5. Competing viewpoints in the reporting

House Republicans and Democrats frame the document releases differently: some GOP lawmakers emphasize the volume released and allege political motives in withholding, while Democrats and victims’ advocates stress the need to expose the scope of abuse and confidential deals; press coverage highlights both the claim that “thousands of pages have been given” and the counterargument that redactions and previously known material limit new revelations ^{[11] [1] [12]}.

6. What we still don’t know from these sources — the key omissions

The provided sources do not enumerate individual NDAs, name all signatories, specify settlement dollar amounts tied to each NDA, or give a year-by-year list of when particular nondisclosure agreements were executed; when asked for “what specific NDAs were used” and “when signed (year),” the sources either do not mention those contract texts or treat settlements and NDAs as part of broader sealed material now subject to disclosure efforts (not found in current reporting) ^{[2] [4]}.

7. How to proceed if you want the exact contracts and dates

To obtain the specific NDAs and signing years, reporters and the public are following the Oversight Committee’s document releases and DOJ disclosures as they post searchable court records and settlement documents; the committee’s web releases and the large media tranches are the primary places to look as they are processed and indexed ^{[4] [2] [3]}. If the user wants, I can guide how to search those released document caches (URLs cited in committee releases) or track particular filings referenced in the legislative push ^{[4] [9]}.

Limitations: This analysis uses only the supplied reporting. The supplied sources document mass releases and legal debate over NDAs but do not provide a forensic list of each nondisclosure agreement tied to Epstein settlements with signing years, so any definitive catalogue is not available in the current reporting (not found in current reporting) ^{[4] [7]}.