What gun was johnathan ross using when he killed nicole good

Checked on January 26, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The public record assembled by multiple news organizations confirms that ICE agent Jonathan Ross fired multiple shots that killed Renee Nicole Good during an enforcement action in Minneapolis on Jan. 7, 2026, but none of the supplied reporting specifies the make or model of the firearm he used [1] [2]. Reporting does describe Ross as a firearms instructor and special‑response team member — facts that shape the investigatory and public narratives even as the specific weapon remains undisclosed in the provided sources [3] [4].

1. Identification of the shooter and what the video shows

Local and national outlets identified the agent who shot Good as Jonathan Ross and published multiple video angles that appear to show an ICE agent firing into Good’s vehicle as it began to move, striking her and killing her [5] [2] [6]. The New York Times and other outlets report Ross fired three shots into a moving SUV, a detail corroborated across coverage [1]. These visual records drive much of the public understanding of the incident, but video still leaves open questions about range, angle, and the exact weapon used because camera resolution and framing generally do not reveal firearm make or model [6].

2. Official context: training, past incidents, and expectations

Federal statements and court testimony portray Ross as a decade‑long ICE veteran, a firearms instructor and member of a Special Response Team — credentials that officials and allies cite to justify his actions and to suggest he was acting in accordance with training when he used lethal force [4] [3]. The administration’s defenders also referenced a June 2025 episode in which Ross was dragged and seriously injured during another vehicle encounter; that prior trauma is repeatedly invoked to explain his reaction to a vehicle in motion [7] [5]. Those biographical facts are relevant to intent and state of mind but do not identify his weapon.

3. What reporting says — and does not say — about the firearm

Despite extensive coverage of the shooting, including frame‑by‑frame scrutiny of videos and identification of Ross by outlets such as The Intercept, The Guardian, the Star Tribune and the New York Times, none of the provided articles names the specific firearm model used in the Jan. 7 shooting [8] [4] [5] [1]. Several pieces note that agents at the scene were reportedly equipped with body‑worn cameras or that footage exists but has not been publicly released, which could contain clearer evidence about the gun if and when released [7]. The absence of a public weapons identification in the reporting supplied here is therefore a documented limitation.

4. Why the weapon detail matters — legal, forensic and political stakes

Knowing the exact weapon can matter for forensic reconstruction — ballistic matching, casing ejection patterns, and forensic distance estimates — and also for legal scrutiny of whether the shots were consistent with training or policy [6]. In this case, federal investigators (including the FBI and internal DHS channels) will examine ballistics, training records and any available body‑camera or surveillance footage to assess justification; the current reporting highlights that such investigatory steps are expected but does not publish results on weapon identification [6] [7].

5. Alternative explanations and possible reasons the reporting omits the weapon model

There are several plausible reasons none of the cited sources names the gun: investigators may still be cataloguing evidence and have not released ballistics reports; news organizations may be relying on video that does not clearly show the firearm; or authorities might be withholding specific weapon information during a criminal or internal review [7] [6]. Reporting also shows partisan and institutional agendas at play — federal officials rapidly defended the agent while local authorities and critics disputed the narrative — which can accelerate political statements even as forensic details remain pending [4] [2].

6. Conclusion — the record and its limits

Based on the supplied reporting, the direct answer is simple and definitive in its limitation: Jonathan Ross is identified as the agent who fired the shots that killed Renee Nicole Good, and he fired multiple rounds into her vehicle, but the provided sources do not state what make or model gun he used [1] [5] [8]. Any further, authoritative identification of the firearm would require release of investigative findings, ballistic reports, or clearer footage that the cited articles say either exist but remain unreleased or have not been publicly detailed [7] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
Has ballistic or forensic evidence from the Renee Good case been released, and what does it show about the firearm used?
How do ICE policies and federal guidelines regulate use of deadly force against vehicles during enforcement actions?
What did body‑worn camera footage from the Jan. 7 Minneapolis incident reveal once (or if) it was released, and how did it change public and legal assessments?