Fact check: What exact acts did Katie Johnson allege Donald Trump committed and when (dates/years)?

1. What the plaintiff explicitly alleged — a clear list of offenses that appears in filings

Katie Johnson’s submissions to court and the text republications allege a set of specific sexual crimes committed by Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein in 1994, when Johnson was 13. The allegations include forcible rape, oral copulation, anal and vaginal rape, being tied to a bed, being forced to perform sexual acts such as manual stimulation and oral sex, and threats by the accused to harm Johnson or her family if she spoke out. These precise acts are reported in the complaint text that circulated in 2025 and in earlier court complaint summaries, showing a consistent characterization that Johnson described multiple forms of rape and sexual assault by both men at Epstein’s New York residence ^{[1] [4]}.

2. The dates and timeline Johnson provided — summer 1994 and multiple incidents

Johnson’s claims are presented as occurring over a span in the summer of 1994, with some filings and republications specifying a four‑month window from June through September 1994 and listing multiple parties where abuse allegedly occurred. The complaint text consistently ties the incidents to Epstein-hosted parties in New York City during that summer and asserts that Johnson was 13 at the time. These temporal details are pivotal because they underlie the plaintiff’s assertion of underage sexual abuse and are repeated across the legal text extracts and reporting that reappeared in 2025 ^{[1] [2]}.

3. The documentary record — what was filed, when, and how the courts handled it

The legal record includes filings titled Katie Johnson v. Donald J. Trump (Case 5:16-cv-00797) and related Southern District of New York complaints from 2016; but significant procedural outcomes followed. One identified case was dismissed on May 2, 2016, and other 2016 filings exist as complaint documents and declarations asserting the alleged acts. The 2016 complaint and Jane Doe declaration articulate the same core allegations later republished in 2025. Court dismissal does not equate to factual determination; the record shows allegations were formally presented but did not result in a trial or appellate ruling affirming the factual claims ^{[3] [2] [4]}.

4. Where reporting and document republication diverge — inconsistencies and convergences

Coverage and republication from 2025 present the allegations with greater graphic specificity than some earlier summaries; the newest texts reproduce detailed descriptions of sexual acts and a precise 1994 timeline, while earlier reports and case summaries sometimes omitted explicit act‑by‑act descriptions. Multiple sources reproduce matching core claims—underage rape and threats by Epstein and Trump at Epstein’s parties—so there is convergence on the main allegations but divergence in granular details and editorial framing. The differences reflect which version of the complaint or declaration each outlet cited, and whether outlets published full allegations or summarized them ^{[5] [1]}.

5. What remains unproven and the open legal and evidentiary questions

The filings allege specific acts and dates, but the public record shows no final judicial finding resolving the truth of those allegations in favor of either party. Dismissals and the absence of a full trial leave evidentiary questions — including corroborating witnesses, forensic evidence, contemporaneous reporting, and responses from accused parties — unanswered in the court record cited here. The material republished in 2025 brings the allegations back into public view but does not add judicial resolution; therefore, the central factual claims about exact acts and their dates remain allegations in filed legal documents rather than adjudicated facts ^{[3] [2] [1]}.