Fact check: Are there any ongoing investigations or lawsuits related to the allegations made by Katie Johnson?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided indicate that there are no ongoing investigations or lawsuits related to the allegations made by Katie Johnson against Donald Trump ^[1]. According to the sources, Katie Johnson filed a lawsuit in 2016 alleging that Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein held her as a 'sex slave' in 1994, but the lawsuit was dismissed by a judge in May 2016 and later refiled and withdrawn ^[1]. The sources also report that Katie Johnson, also known as 'Jane Doe', filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump in 2016, alleging that he repeatedly raped her at Jeffrey Epstein's New York City apartment in 1994 when she was 13 years old, but the lawsuit was dropped in November 2016 ^[2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some sources do not provide any direct information about ongoing investigations or lawsuits related to Katie Johnson's allegations against Donald Trump, and instead focus on other topics, such as Trump's remarks on different issues ^[3] or the release of documents from Jeffrey Epstein's estate ^[4]. Additionally, some sources mention a viral social media post that includes a court document with allegations of sexual assault against Donald Trump, made by Katie Johnson in a lawsuit filed in 2016 ^[1]. It is also worth noting that some sources do not mention Katie Johnson or any allegations related to her, which could indicate a lack of information or a deliberate omission ^[3]. Alternative viewpoints on the topic are not explicitly presented in the sources, but it can be inferred that different individuals and groups may have varying opinions on the allegations and their validity ^{[1] [2]}.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement asks about ongoing investigations or lawsuits related to the allegations made by Katie Johnson, but the sources suggest that there are no ongoing investigations or lawsuits ^{[1] [2]}. This could indicate that the original statement is based on outdated or incorrect information. Additionally, some sources may be biased towards or against Donald Trump, which could impact the presentation of information and the conclusions drawn by the reader ^[3]. It is also possible that the sources are selectively presenting information, which could lead to a lack of context or a distorted view of the topic ^{[4] [1]}. Overall, it is crucial to consider multiple sources and viewpoints when evaluating the allegations and their validity ^{[1] [2]}.