Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What specific statements has Katie Johnson made under oath about Donald Trump and when were they given?
Executive summary
Katie Johnson — a name used by an anonymous plaintiff who filed a 2016 civil complaint alleging she was raped as a minor by Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump in 1994 — made sworn statements in court filings and affidavits attached to that lawsuit, which was filed and later dropped in 2016 (case Katie Johnson v. Donald J. Trump, 5:16‑cv‑00797) [1] [2]. Available sources say those sworn statements were made in the context of the 2016 civil complaint and supporting affidavits; they do not provide a full transcript of each statement or an exhaustive, date‑stamped list of every sworn declaration beyond the filings in that case [1] [3].
1. The legal context: a 2016 civil suit and supporting affidavits
Katie Johnson is the pseudonym used in a civil complaint first filed in 2016 that named Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump; the docket and filings for Katie Johnson v. Donald J. Trump are publicly available and list the complaint and associated documents in the Central District (case number 5:16‑cv‑00797) [1]. Reporting and legal summaries say the suit included sworn statements and affidavits from the plaintiff and from alleged corroborating witnesses [2] [3]. Those sworn materials are part of the court record associated with the 2016 filing [1].
2. What the sworn statements allege
According to the complaint and accompanying affidavits described in archival copies and reporting, the plaintiff (using the Katie Johnson pseudonym) alleged she was recruited as a minor in 1994, raped by Epstein, and forced to have sex with Donald Trump on multiple occasions in New York and Florida; the filings also included testimony from at least one witness described as corroborating those allegations [4] [3]. Multiple sources summarize these core allegations as the substance of the sworn claims attached to the 2016 lawsuit [4] [2].
3. Timing and form: when the sworn statements were given
The sworn statements appear in the 2016 civil complaint and in affidavits filed with that suit — the case was initially filed in April/June 2016 and refiled in October 2016 before the plaintiff withdrew the suit in November 2016, according to contemporaneous summaries [2] [1]. Archive copies of the lawsuit documents (including affidavits that reference a witness “Tiffany Doe”) are available in public archives and docket collections, indicating these statements were made in connection with the 2016 litigation [3] [1]. Specific calendar dates for each affidavit or sworn declaration beyond the general 2016 filing window are not enumerated in the provided sources [1] [3].
4. Anonymity, pseudonyms, and corroboration claims
The plaintiff used a pseudonym (“Katie Johnson”); the lawsuit and related documents used other pseudonyms for alleged corroborating witnesses (for example, “Tiffany Doe”), a practice noted in reporting and archive texts [3] [2]. Sources say the filings included assertions that those witnesses would provide sworn corroboration, but the sources also document that the anonymous posture and pseudonyms limited public ability to independently verify identities or to see in‑court testimony because the case was not litigated to trial [3] [2].
5. What the record does not show or confirm
Available sources do not provide a verbatim, date‑stamped transcript of a deposition or courtroom testimony by Katie Johnson in open court; instead the record presented publicly consists of the complaint and supporting sworn affidavits filed as part of the 2016 civil litigation [1] [3]. Sources also state the civil case was dropped in November 2016 and there is no active case or settlement publicly documented in 2024–2025, meaning those sworn statements were never tested through a full public trial in the sources provided [2] [1].
6. Disputes, media coverage, and how the story resurfaced
Reporting and fact‑check articles note the allegations have resurfaced repeatedly whenever Epstein‑related documents or media attention return to the topic; fact checks emphasize that the 2016 suit ended without trial and that anonymity and inconsistent public interviews have fueled both skepticism and persistent circulation of the claims [2] [4]. Some outlets and timelines recount that the plaintiff received threats and that the suit’s withdrawal left the sworn statements legally unresolved in court [2] [1].
7. Bottom line for readers seeking the exact sworn words and dates
For an exact, itemized list of every sworn sentence or a line‑by‑line transcript with precise date stamps, the provided sources do not supply that level of granular documentation; they point to the complaint and attached affidavits filed in 2016 and archived in court dockets and public repositories [1] [3]. If you want those original filings and affidavit pages with their filing dates, consult the 2016 docket (Katie Johnson v. Donald J. Trump, 5:16‑cv‑00797) and the archived lawsuit documents referenced above [1] [3].