Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Kenneth Starr's other major investigations before Epstein
Executive summary
Ken (Kenneth) Starr is best known for leading the independent counsel probe that produced the Starr Report and helped trigger President Bill Clinton’s 1998 impeachment over Whitewater and the Lewinsky affair [1]. Before and after that, his public career included major high‑profile matters: the Whitewater/Clinton investigation, roles as U.S. solicitor general and in private practice handling politically charged cases, and later controversial work defending Jeffrey Epstein and his presidency‑defense role for Donald Trump [1] [2] [3].
1. The signature: Whitewater, the Starr Report and Clinton’s impeachment
Kenneth Starr rose to national prominence as independent counsel investigating the Whitewater real‑estate controversy and related matters in the mid‑1990s; his work culminated in the Starr Report, which formed the factual basis for the House impeachment inquiry and articles against President Clinton in 1998 [1]. Coverage repeatedly frames this episode as Starr’s defining public role and the pivot that made him a household name [1] [2].
2. Career positions that set up later influence: solicitor general, clerking and Republican networks
Starr’s résumé before Whitewater included clerking for Chief Justice Warren Burger and serving in Republican legal circles, later becoming U.S. solicitor general — positions that built both legal credentials and political connections that sources say he later leveraged in private practice [2]. Reporters and book authors note that those connections were relevant when he later joined high‑profile defense teams [4] [5].
3. Private‑practice megacases: from Blackwater and ballot measures to Supreme Court fights
In private practice, Starr represented politically charged clients and causes: he defended a school board in the “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” Supreme Court matter, backed supporters of a California proposition banning same‑sex marriage, and represented controversial clients such as the private military firm Blackwater — work that kept him prominent in conservative legal circles [6] [2]. These cases bolstered his profile as a go‑to conservative lawyer rather than a narrow criminal‑defense specialist [6].
4. The Epstein connection: role, tactics and controversy
Multiple accounts and book reporting contend Starr joined Epstein’s defense team in the mid‑2000s and became part of what Julie K. Brown’s reporting and subsequent books describe as a “scorched‑earth” campaign to pressure federal prosecutors to abandon a sex‑trafficking case, helping secure the widely criticized 2008 plea deal [3] [4] [5]. Reporting says Starr used his Washington ties and aggressive legal tactics — including attacking prosecutors’ motives — in efforts tied to that plea arrangement [4] [7].
5. How sources frame Starr’s motives and defenses
Accounts differ in tone but converge on key facts: Starr and defenders said he believed everyone deserves representation and that his role was professional legal advocacy [3]. Investigative reporters and critics portray him as a “fixer” who used political influence to obtain leniency for Epstein; Brown’s book and press coverage offer the strongest claims that Starr actively lobbied DOJ officials and pressed the case to be dropped [3] [4] [5].
6. Institutional fallout and later roles: Baylor, Trump, and reputation effects
After the Epstein controversy and other developments, Starr’s later career included serving as Baylor University president — a post he left amid criticism over Baylor’s handling of sexual‑assault allegations — and returning to partisan litigation, including acting on President Trump’s behalf during the 2020 Senate impeachment trial [3] [1]. These episodes compounded public debate about whether Starr’s record reflected principled legalism or selective advocacy.
7. Limits of available reporting and remaining questions
Available sources document Starr’s involvement with Epstein’s defense and portray his tactics and network influence, but they vary in how directly they attribute specific outcomes solely to Starr’s actions; some claims are drawn from Julie K. Brown’s book and accounts of unnamed prosecutors [4] [5]. Detailed internal DOJ decision‑making and every contemporaneous communication are not exhaustively presented in the provided reporting — available sources do not mention the full set of DOJ deliberations or all internal files beyond cited emails and letters [4] [5].
8. Bottom line for readers
Starr’s other major investigations and public legal work before and after Epstein centered on the Whitewater/Clinton probe, high‑stakes conservative litigation, and prominent private‑sector defenses; his later participation in Epstein’s defense is widely reported as pivotal and controversial because sources say he used political influence and aggressive tactics to press federal authorities [1] [2] [4] [3]. Readers weighing Starr’s legacy will find consistent documentation of these roles in the reporting cited above, even as interpretations of his motives differ between his defenders and investigative journalists [3] [4].