Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Https://juryverdictalert.com/assault-and-battery/assault-4-defendants-2-plaintiffs Four partying men brutally beat on brother and sister outside LA restaurant; $72M. Los Angeles County.

Checked on June 4, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement is substantially accurate but lacks important details. The incident involved four specific individuals - Alberto Driz, Maurice Driz, Shawn Driz, and William Joelson - who assaulted Anne and Mathew Greene outside a Los Angeles restaurant [1]. The jury awarded a total of $72.6 million, broken down into $38,065,402 in compensatory damages and $34,580,000 in punitive damages [1].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial contextual elements were omitted from the original statement:

  • The victims were good Samaritans who were attempting to intervene when the defendants were attacking a TMZ photographer [2]
  • The defendants were business owners of Blaze Pizza franchises [1]
  • The incident occurred after the defendants were leaving a birthday celebration [1]
  • The severity of injuries was significant, including:
  • Blunt force trauma
  • Broken bones
  • Mild traumatic brain injury
  • PTSD [1]
  • The criminal consequences were relatively light compared to the civil penalties:
  • The Driz defendants received only 45 days in jail
  • William Joelson avoided criminal prosecution due to statute of limitations expiring [1]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement, while factually accurate, presents an oversimplified version of events that could lead to misunderstandings:

  • It fails to mention that this was not a random attack but escalated from an initial confrontation with a TMZ photographer [1]
  • The term "partying men" understates their status as business owners, which may have influenced the size of the punitive damages award [1]
  • The statement doesn't reflect the full legal context - while the civil case resulted in significant damages, the criminal consequences were relatively minor [1]
  • The description "brutally beat" is actually supported by the evidence of severe injuries documented in multiple sources [1]
Want to dive deeper?
What factors determine multi-million dollar awards in assault and battery cases?
How do California courts calculate damages for physical assault victims?
What is the difference between criminal charges and civil lawsuits in assault cases?
Can defendants appeal large jury verdicts in personal injury cases?
What evidence is typically required to prove assault and battery in civil court?