Can landlords legally charge late fees while awaiting delayed housing voucher payments?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Landlords cannot universally use HUD delays as a legal excuse to evict voucher holders or force tenants to cover the housing authority’s unpaid portion; federal guidance and multiple local PHAs say tenants should not be penalized and eviction for the housing authority’s nonpayment is prohibited [1] [2] [3]. Local law and the HAP contract can allow limited remedies for landlords — some PHAs must pay owner late-penalties under Part B, Section 7(a) of the HAP contract — but those penalties are owed by the PHA, not charged to tenants without specific local legal authority [4] [5].
1. Eviction bans and tenant protections: who bears the risk?
Federal and local officials repeatedly state that tenants with Housing Choice Vouchers cannot be evicted solely because the public housing authority (PHA) or HUD is late in remitting the subsidy; reporting from multiple cities and advocates confirms that eviction for the PHA’s nonpayment is not permitted and tenants should continue to pay their own share [1] [3] [2]. That protection is the first-line rule in contemporary coverage of the December 2025 shortfalls and in prior delay episodes: landlords are told not to treat voucher beneficiaries as nonpaying tenants when the government portion is delayed [1] [2].
2. Late fees: neither automatically allowed nor automatically barred
Available reporting makes clear that whether a landlord can impose a late fee while waiting on a HAP payment depends on multiple authorities — the lease, local law, PHA rules, and the HAP contract — not on a blanket federal exemption. Industry guidance and PHA contract language show PHAs may owe penalties to landlords when payments are late (Part B, Section 7(a) of the HAP contract), and the PHAs’ obligations do not automatically translate into a right for owners to pass fees onto tenants absent legal grounds in the lease or jurisdiction [4] [5]. In short: landlords are not uniformly empowered to charge tenants late fees for the government’s delayed portion; whether they can charge any fee for the tenant’s unpaid share depends on local statutes and lease terms [4].
3. The PHA’s duty to landlords, and owner remedies
Several sources stress that PHAs have contractually recognized duties to make “shortfall” or HAP payments and, where those payments are late after prescribed periods, some HAP contracts require the PHA to pay owner penalties [4] [5]. Industry groups such as NAHRO have advised housing authorities to review Section 7 of the HAP contract for when penalties may be imposed, and some PHA advisories explicitly tell landlords that the authority will pay owners immediately upon receipt of federal funds [5] [1]. That creates an avenue for owners to recover delayed amounts — usually from the PHA — rather than shifting costs to the tenant.
4. Local law, lease language, and “customary” practice matter
Practical guidance aimed at landlords stresses that any late penalty must be legal where the property sits and “customary in your business practice,” and that the amount should be disclosed in the lease; otherwise the landlord risks violating state or municipal consumer/tenant protections [4]. New York reporting highlights that state law can create grace periods that block late fees for a short window — tellingly, local legal frameworks often supersede industry expectations about charging late fees to voucher tenants [3].
5. What landlords typically do — and why PHAs urge communication
Coverage of the December 2025 delays shows landlords and PHAs under strain: PHAs say they will prioritize payments and communicate timelines, and industry groups urge PHAs to consult HUD guidance and HAP contract Section 7 for remedies [5] [6]. PHAs and advocates repeatedly recommend that tenants keep paying their portion and that landlords communicate with PHAs to preserve housing stability; PHAs in several jurisdictions promise to make payments “immediately upon receipt” of HUD funds [1] [5].
6. Competing interests and likely outcomes
Landlords face cash-flow pressure and some industry outlets note owners sometimes seek to treat voucher rent as any other unpaid rent; housing advocates and PHAs push back, warning that forcing tenants to pay the government’s share or evicting them risks illegal discrimination and housing instability [4] [2] [3]. The HAP contract and PHA pledges to pay owner penalties suggest the federal/PHA side accepts liability for delayed subsidies; whether that liability leads to immediate owner reimbursement or litigation will vary by PHA and local law [5] [4].
Limitations and next steps: the available reporting documents national HUD shortfalls, PHA guidance and HAP-contract language but does not list every state or city rule on late fees; readers should check their lease, local tenant-landlord statutes, and their PHA’s specific guidance (not found in current reporting) for a definitive, jurisdiction-specific answer [4] [5] [1].