Did any leftist climed up the roof and shoot an ICE center

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, yes, there was indeed an incident where someone climbed onto a roof and shot at an ICE facility. The incident occurred at the Dallas Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office, where Joshua Jahn climbed to the rooftop of a nearby building and fired 'indiscriminately' at the ICE facility ^[1]. The shooting resulted in two detainees being killed and one other person in ICE custody being critically injured ^[2].

The shooter, Joshua Jahn, was found dead at the scene from a self-inflicted gunshot wound ^{[1] [2]}. Crucially, anti-ICE messages were found on bullet casings near Jahn, suggesting ideological motivation behind the attack ^[2]. The incident is being investigated as 'an act of targeted violence' by authorities ^{[1] [2]}.

Multiple sources confirm the basic facts of the shooting, with at least one person killed and two others injured at the Texas ICE facility ^{[3] [4]}. The attack was carried out by a suspected sniper who positioned himself strategically on a rooftop to target the detention center ^[3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question specifically asks about a "leftist" perpetrator, but none of the sources explicitly identify Joshua Jahn's specific political affiliation or ideology ^{[3] [4] [1]}. While anti-ICE messages were found on bullet casings, this indicates opposition to ICE policies rather than confirming a specific political identity ^[2].

The analyses reveal a broader context of violent rhetoric and threats against ICE law enforcement, including comparisons to Nazi Gestapo and secret police ^[5]. This suggests the shooting occurred within an environment of heightened anti-ICE sentiment and inflammatory language targeting immigration enforcement agencies.

Additionally, the sources document violent attacks and doxing of ICE officers by anarchist and Antifa-affiliated groups ^[6], and note that Antifa has been designated as a domestic terrorist organization due to its involvement in violent attacks ^[7]. This provides important context about organized opposition to ICE operations, though these sources don't directly connect to the Dallas shooting incident.

The analyses also reference violent riots and lawlessness in cities like Los Angeles and legislative responses to address 'anarchist jurisdictions' ^[8], indicating broader patterns of anti-government violence that may provide context for understanding targeted attacks on federal facilities.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains several problematic elements that suggest potential bias or misinformation. First, it assumes the perpetrator was a "leftist" without evidence - while anti-ICE messages were found, no sources confirm the shooter's specific political ideology ^[2]. This represents a prejudicial assumption that may reflect the questioner's own political biases.

The phrasing "climed up the roof" (with the misspelling) and the casual tone suggest the question may be designed to confirm existing beliefs rather than seek factual information. The question appears to be leading, potentially seeking to validate a narrative about left-wing violence against immigration enforcement.

Furthermore, the question omits crucial details about the victims - specifically that two detainees (immigrants in ICE custody) were killed, not ICE agents or staff ^[2]. This omission could reflect an attempt to frame the incident in a way that emphasizes political violence while downplaying the human cost to vulnerable populations.

The question also fails to acknowledge the complexity of anti-ICE sentiment, which ranges from legitimate policy criticism to extremist violence. By focusing solely on whether a "leftist" committed the act, it oversimplifies the broader context of immigration policy debates and the various forms of opposition to ICE operations documented in the sources ^{[5] [9] [10]}.

The framing suggests potential confirmation bias, where the questioner may be seeking evidence to support predetermined conclusions about political violence rather than genuinely investigating the facts of this tragic incident.