Were there legal outcomes or investigations tied to fatalities that occurred during the 2020 protests?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Legal consequences and investigations did follow many of the high‑profile deaths tied to the 2020 protests: Derek Chauvin’s criminal conviction was the clearest criminal accountability, multiple local and federal probes examined other fatal and injurious incidents, and a wave of civil suits produced tens of millions in settlements — but outcomes vary widely from convictions to closed or still‑pending inquiries [1] [2] [3]. Reporting and datasets show that while some deaths prompted prosecutions or disciplined officers, many fatalities remained the subject of long investigations, unclear links to protests, or civil litigation rather than criminal charges [4] [5] [6].
1. The singular accountability: Chauvin’s prosecution and its legal significance
The most definitive legal outcome tied to the protests was former Minneapolis officer Derek Chauvin’s criminal prosecution and conviction for the murder of George Floyd, a case that catalyzed the protests and met the demonstrators’ demand for officer accountability when a jury convicted Chauvin in 2021 [1] [7]. That criminal case also spawned federal and state reviews of policing practices and intensified scrutiny of how departments respond to protest‑era uses of force, prompting separate audits and reviews by oversight bodies [2] [7].
2. Fatal shootings and uneven criminal responses outside Minneapolis
Several protest‑period shootings resulted in criminal investigations with divergent paths: the Kenosha late‑night shootings that killed Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber drew intense legal attention and prosecutions tied to armed actors at demonstrations, and other deaths — such as a pawn‑shop shooting in Minneapolis and a protest‑area killing in Omaha and others noted in counts of protest‑linked fatalities — triggered local probes, but not all produced charges or convictions [4] [5]. In at least one Minneapolis pawn‑shop death investigators ultimately declined to charge the shop owner after a six‑month probe citing lack of cooperative witnesses and destroyed footage, illustrating how evidence gaps impeded criminal cases [5].
3. Federal investigations, oversight reviews and stalled or opaque outcomes
Federal bodies weighed in across multiple fronts: the DOJ’s Office of Inspector General and other federal offices opened reviews of department responses to unrest, and some OIG reviews were paused where criminal investigations were ongoing, underscoring the overlap between administrative oversight and criminal probes [2]. The FBI and ATF investigated arson and other violent incidents tied to the unrest, and the FBI examined specific deaths where motive or connection to protests was unclear — for example, the FBI probed whether certain security‑guard or officer deaths were related to protest activity [5] [6] [8]. Public reporting shows, however, that many federal inquiries either concluded without charges or remained unresolved for months.
4. Civil liability, settlements and the policy aftershocks
While criminal prosecutions were limited, civil litigation produced substantial legal outcomes: cities settled more than 130 lawsuits arising from police conduct during the protests, totaling nearly $150 million and prompting reforms such as limits on “less‑lethal” weapons in some jurisdictions — a form of accountability by financial and policy remedy rather than criminal punishment [3]. Investigative projects and watchdogs catalogued thousands of complaints and dozens to hundreds of departmental investigations into protest policing actions — for example, Seattle’s Office of Police Accountability recorded thousands of complaints and opened many investigations — indicating sustained administrative and civil legal activity even where criminal charges did not follow [9].
5. What remains uncertain and why conclusions must be cautious
Available sources document prosecutions, settlements, federal reviews and many ongoing probes, but they also demonstrate major limits: datasets tallying protest‑linked deaths vary (ACLED, The Guardian, Forbes/Wikipedia counts differ), motives and direct ties to protests were sometimes indeterminate and the FBI continued to investigate ambiguous cases, and reporting confirms many investigations closed without federal charges while others remained pending or opaque [10] [4] [6] [11]. The result is a mixed legal scene — some criminal accountability, substantial civil remedies and wide‑ranging federal and local investigations, alongside numerous unresolved or evidence‑limited cases — and the record in the provided reporting does not cover every fatality or its eventual legal disposition [5] [2] [3].