Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Who are the main groups or leaders charged with seditious conspiracy for January 6 2021?
Executive Summary
The central, verifiable finding is that two far‑right militia organizations—the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys—are the principal groups whose leaders were charged with seditious conspiracy for the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack, with multiple leaders convicted in separate trials and sentenced (sources from 2022 through 2025 document those prosecutions). Reporting and court records identify Stewart Rhodes and Kelly Meggs among Oath Keepers leaders and Enrique Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, and Zachary Rehl among Proud Boys leaders as primary figures charged and convicted on seditious‑conspiracy counts; additional Oath Keepers members such as Roberto Minuta, Edward Vallejo, David Moerschel, and Joseph Hackett were also prosecuted and sentenced in later actions [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Who were prosecuted as the hard core: two militias front and center
Court filings and major news accounts consistently single out the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys as the groups against whom the Justice Department brought its most serious seditious‑conspiracy charges in the Jan. 6 cases. The PBS NewsHour piece from July 11, 2022, frames the Justice Department’s highest‑profile conspiracy theory as targeting those two organizations, with Stewart Rhodes and Enrique Tarrio named as emblematic leaders charged with coordinating efforts around the attack [1]. Subsequent federal trials and sentencing documents, reported through 2025, reinforced that prosecutorial emphasis by securing convictions against multiple leaders and rank‑and‑file participants from both groups; these outcomes shaped public and legal understanding of Jan. 6 as not solely a spontaneous riot but involving organized efforts by extremist networks [2] [5]. The focus on these militias also drove congressional and media scrutiny, which sometimes framed the prosecutions as a test of the government’s ability to prove coordinated, politically motivated criminal conspiracies.
2. Who among the Oath Keepers was central to seditious‑conspiracy counts
Federal indictments and later convictions identified Elmer Stewart Rhodes III (Stewart Rhodes) as the founder and principal Oath Keepers leader charged with seditious conspiracy, alongside Florida chapter leader Kelly Meggs, with both receiving lengthy sentences after trials that the DOJ publicized through official press releases in February 2025 and earlier reporting [3] [4]. Additional Oath Keepers members—Roberto Minuta, Edward Vallejo, David Moerschel, and Joseph Hackett—were later added to seditious‑conspiracy convictions or sentenced as the department pursued further trials and pleas tied to coordinated planning and armed mobilization surrounding Jan. 6 [3] [4]. These prosecutions were presented by prosecutors as evidence of a hierarchical effort to breach the Capitol, with the DOJ’s National Security and Criminal Divisions leading prosecutions that emphasized planning, communications, and paramilitary conduct alleged in courtroom evidence [3].
3. Which Proud Boys leaders faced the charge and how the convictions landed
Prosecutions of the Proud Boys culminated in guilty verdicts for top figures: Enrique Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, and Zachary Rehl were found guilty of seditious conspiracy in high‑profile trials, while some co‑defendants received mixed outcomes, including acquittal on that specific count for Dominic Pezzola [2]. News analysis framing these results emphasized that prosecutors argued the Proud Boys’ leadership organized coordinated travel, timing, and tactical roles at the Capitol, which juries accepted as satisfying seditious‑conspiracy elements—agreement to use force to obstruct the lawful transfer of presidential power [2]. Reporting from 2025 notes that sentences were significant; however, some political actors later advanced clemency or commutation narratives, which complicated public perceptions and sparked debates over selective mercy and political interference in accountability [6].
4. What’s consistent across reporting and where accounts diverge
All vetted sources agree on the primacy of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys in seditious‑conspiracy prosecutions tied to Jan. 6, and they consistently list the same core leaders as defendants in those counts [1] [2] [5]. Divergences appear in scope and emphasis: Department of Justice press releases and prosecution‑focused accounts list additional Oath Keepers members convicted in later actions [3] [4], while some media summaries emphasize political fallout, pardons, or commutations—topics that reporters treat as separate from the factual record of convictions [6]. The apparent agenda differences are visible: legal documents and DOJ communications stress evidentiary details and sentencing, whereas some news outlets foreground political responses and narrative framing that can either underscore accountability or frame prosecutions as partisan.
5. Bottom line for readers tracking accountability and moving targets
The definitive legal reality documented by the cited reporting and DOJ statements is that multiple leaders and members of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys were charged, tried, convicted, and sentenced for seditious conspiracy tied to Jan. 6; subsequent actions such as commutations or pardons have complicated public perception but do not erase the convictions reflected in court records and press releases through 2025 [3] [2] [6]. For those monitoring ongoing accountability, the key takeaway is that prosecutions targeted organized networks and leaders, not merely isolated participants, and that official evidence presented in trials formed the backbone of seditious‑conspiracy findings. Observers should note both the legal outcomes and the political responses as separate but interacting parts of the Jan. 6 accountability story [5] [6].