Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
List of major lawsuits against Donald Trump by sexual accusers
Executive Summary
The core verified claim is that multiple women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct, but only a small number filed civil lawsuits; the most consequential is E. Jean Carroll’s multi-track litigation that produced large damage awards now on appeal. Counting and characterizing claims varies widely across sources: some report roughly two active legal actions by accusers, others list dozens of accusers whose allegations did not result in major lawsuits [1] [2] [3].
1. Why E. Jean Carroll’s cases loom largest in the legal record
E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits are the clearest, best-documented civil claims that produced binding judgments against Donald Trump and thus anchor the category of “major lawsuits.” A New York jury found for Carroll on a sexual assault claim and awarded compensatory damages, and subsequent rulings and related proceedings have produced a cumulative damages figure reported as approximately $88.3 million, with parts of those awards currently under appeal [1] [4]. Carroll’s initial complaint alleged a specific incident in the mid-1990s and a later pattern of defamatory statements by Trump after she went public; courts treated the matters as both tort (battery/assault) and defamation, creating distinct legal tracks and remedies. The litigation’s complexity—jury findings on factual allegations, separate damage calculations, and active appellate and certiorari-level filings—makes Carroll’s suits uniquely consequential compared with other accusers’ matters [1] [4].
2. The gap between allegations and lawsuits: dozens of accusers, few litigants
Reporting across sources shows a consistent pattern: many women have accused Trump—estimates range from around 18 up to 28 named accusers in compiled timelines—but most did not pursue civil lawsuits, and only a handful brought formal cases [2] [3]. News compendia and legal trackers list dozens of public allegations spanning decades, but legal actions require different burdens—statute of limitations, available evidence, and plaintiffs’ willingness to sue. The discrepancy between public allegations and filed suits clarifies why lists of “major lawsuits” are short: the legal record centers on litigated, adjudicated cases rather than the broader catalogue of allegations. This distinction matters because adjudicated outcomes (verdicts, settlements, dismissals) are what legal trackers and courts record as “lawsuits,” while public accusations alone do not translate into judicial findings [5] [6].
3. Other named cases: Summer Zervos and dropped actions that shaped the narrative
Beyond Carroll, other accusers engaged the courts with mixed outcomes. Summer Zervos filed a defamation suit related to denials during the 2016 campaign; her case drew public attention but was ultimately dropped or did not produce a major adverse judgment against Trump, illustrating how high-profile allegations sometimes stall in litigation [7]. The broader media timeline also ties in non-litigation elements—such as the leaked 2005 tape and contemporaneous political reactions—which influenced public perception but did not convert into uniform legal liability. This mix of public, political, and legal developments shows how narrative resonance differs from legal resolution: some accusations reverberate widely but do not result in civil judgments, while fewer litigated claims yield concrete legal consequences [8] [7].
4. How sources diverge on counts, outcomes, and framing
Source summaries diverge in emphasis and counts: legal trackers stress pending cases and active litigation, encyclopedic compilations list names and allegations, and timeline pieces focus on chronology and public impact. One set of analyses documents Carroll’s multiple wins and the dollar figures tied to them, another highlights that only “two” accusers took legal action historically while dozens made allegations, and yet another emphasizes a larger roster of accusers reaching nearly three dozen [1] [2] [3]. These differences reflect editorial choices—legal significance versus comprehensive cataloging—and possible agendas: legal trackers foreground court outcomes, advocacy-oriented timelines prioritize breadth, and neutral compendia may aim for exhaustive listing. The divergence underscores the need to separate legally adjudicated cases from the broader set of allegations when compiling a list of “major lawsuits” [5] [9].
5. What remains unresolved and why the picture keeps changing
Several facts are settled—Carroll’s verdicts and damage awards, Trump’s repeated denials, and that many women publicly accused him—yet open issues persist: appeals and high-court petitions could alter final liability, statutory limits prevented lawsuits on some allegations, and public disclosures continued beyond the initial reporting windows [1] [9]. The litigation landscape is dynamic because judicial review, appellate rulings, and procedural dismissals can change what counts as a “major” lawsuit; a case with public prominence can shrink legally if dismissed or expand if appellate courts reinstate judgments. For a definitive, up-to-date list of major lawsuits, the operative metric must be adjudicated filings and final judgments rather than the broader corpus of allegations, because only judicial outcomes translate into enduring legal records [4] [7].