What were the central pieces of evidence and key witness testimonies in the Manhattan hush‑money trial?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The Manhattan hush‑money trial turned on two intertwined threads: witness accounts that traced how hush payments were orchestrated and documentary evidence — bank records, emails, invoices, phone records and a surreptitious recording — that prosecutors said corroborated those accounts [1] [2]. The prosecution relied chiefly on Michael Cohen’s on‑the‑stand admissions, Stormy Daniels’ recounting of the payment, and tabloid publisher David Pecker’s description of “catch‑and‑kill” deals, while the defense sought to undermine credibility and offered alternate witnesses such as Bob Costello [1] [3] [4] [5].
1. Michael Cohen: the star witness who said he acted at Trump’s direction
Michael Cohen was the central human narrative: he admitted arranging and paying $130,000 to Stormy Daniels, testified that he did so at Donald Trump’s direction, and described being reimbursed later through bookkeeping entries he said were falsely labeled as legal expenses [1] [3]. Prosecutors presented Cohen as the linchpin whose testimony was bolstered by contemporaneous texts, emails and phone data; the defense focused relentlessly on Cohen’s credibility, portraying him as an untrustworthy fixer [1] [6].
2. Stormy Daniels: the recipient who corroborated the payment and the timing
Stormy Daniels testified about the alleged 2006 encounter and the $130,000 payment she received shortly before the 2016 election, providing the prosecution with a direct account of the transaction that triggered the falsified records count [7] [1]. Her testimony was used to tie Cohen’s payment to the election‑period motive prosecutors argued was necessary to elevate business‑records falsification into a felony [8].
3. David Pecker and the “catch‑and‑kill” tapes: a publisher’s account of deal‑making
David Pecker, former National Enquirer publisher, described meetings in Trump Tower and the tabloid’s “catch‑and‑kill” payments — including $150,000 to Karen McDougal and $30,000 to a doorman — offered to suppress stories unfavorable to Trump, which prosecutors used to show a pattern of coordinated suppression of damaging material [3] [4]. Pecker’s testimony connected the Daniels payment to a broader campaign of story‑suppression, providing context beyond Cohen’s isolated payment [8].
4. Documentary backbone: bank records, emails, checks, invoices and a recording
Prosecutors introduced a dense stack of documentary evidence: bank transfers showing the movement of funds (including a $131,000 deposit tied to Cohen’s HELOC), invoices, vouchers and checks summarized for the jury, emails to and from Cohen, and an audio recording Cohen secretly made in 2016 in which Trump discussed payment amounts — items the prosecution said corroborated witness accounts [9] [2] [3] [1]. Custodial witnesses and DA paralegals authenticated phone records and device data to map communications and timings [2] [10] [7].
5. Custodial and technical witnesses: phone forensics and accounting linkages
A series of custodial witnesses — phone‑company records custodians and Manhattan DA paralegals — introduced cell‑phone metadata and linked emails and deposits to narrow timeframes, while Trump Organization employees and finance witnesses described internal invoicing practices and signatures, which prosecutors used to argue that the falsified entries were part of a deliberate reimbursement scheme [2] [10] [9]. Those technical layers were intended to buttress Cohen’s timeline and rebut defense suggestions of fabrication.
6. Defense strategy and rebuttals: attacking credibility and offering alternatives
The defense emphasized Cohen’s criminal past and motive to lie, calling witnesses such as Bob Costello to counterbalance Cohen and to suggest alternative interpretations of the evidence; they argued payments and recordkeeping were not criminal and that the prosecution relied on an unreliable star witness [5] [6] [11]. Judges also limited some evidentiary moves — for example on the Access Hollywood tape — reflecting contested boundaries of permissible context [5].
7. Outcome and evidentiary assessment
The jury returned a guilty verdict after hearing the combined testimonial and documentary package prosecutors assembled — testimony from Cohen, Daniels, Pecker and corroborating forensic and financial records — which Reuters summarized as bank records, emails and the surreptitious recording that culminated in the conviction [1]. Alternative viewpoints and credibility attacks were central to the defense’s counterpunch, but the prosecution’s mosaic of witnesses and documents formed the evidentiary core the jury credited [1] [8].