How have survivors like Maria Farmer and Virginia Giuffre described the men they accused, and what legal actions have followed those allegations?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Maria Farmer has described being sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at multiple properties, reporting threats and early contact with law enforcement in 1996, and she has since pursued litigation alleging official failures; Virginia Giuffre has described being trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell as a teenager and identified several powerful men she says were given access to her, leading to civil defamation suits, settlements and renewed criminal and civil scrutiny of associates [1] [2] [3].
1. Maria Farmer’s portrait of the men she accused
Maria Farmer says she encountered Epstein and Maxwell in 1995–1996 at art-world events and that both sexually assaulted her and, in separate incidents, her then-15‑year‑old sister, with Farmer recounting that Epstein threatened to “burn down” her house if she revealed photos and that she barricaded herself to escape an assault — claims she swore to in a 2019 affidavit and has reiterated in subsequent filings and public statements [1] [3] [4].
2. How Virginia Giuffre characterized alleged perpetrators and their role
Virginia Giuffre has long described herself as a trafficked minor who was exploited by Epstein and Maxwell and who was directed to have sex with other powerful men; in sworn affidavits and memoir she named specific figures she said were among those given access to her, described the experience as “sex trafficking” from her teens into early adulthood, and portrayed Epstein and Maxwell as organizers and controllers of that exploitation [2] [5].
3. Litigation and legal outcomes tied to those descriptions
Giuffre’s allegations spawned multiple civil actions: she sued Ghislaine Maxwell for defamation in 2015 and ultimately reached a reported multimillion‑dollar sealed settlement in 2017, she filed a high‑profile defamation suit against Alan Dershowitz in 2019 that drew new affidavits including Farmer’s, and she later settled with Prince Andrew in a 2022 out‑of‑court agreement while continuing other claims and public testimony [2] [6] [7] [8].
4. Maria Farmer’s push for accountability and recent legal moves
Farmer pressed law enforcement as early as 1996 and has criticized investigators for inaction, celebrating the Department of Justice’s partial release of files under transparency legislation as vindication while also filing litigation against federal authorities alleging negligence and failure to protect victims — her dossier has been used in civil suits against Epstein’s estate and she appears as a named plaintiff in litigation seeking damages and public records [3] [6] [9] [4].
5. Denials, counterclaims and official responses
Those accused or implicated have repeatedly denied Giuffre’s and Farmer’s specific allegations: Dershowitz has vigorously disputed claims against him and pursued his own legal responses, Prince Andrew denied wrongdoing yet agreed to settle civil claims, and UK police publicly said they found no evidence to continue an investigation into Andrew after reviewing certain leads; at the same time Maxwell was criminally prosecuted and convicted as a recruiter in Epstein’s network, an outcome that both corroborated parts of survivors’ accounts and left other questions — including about who else may have been involved and when investigators knew what — still contested in court and public debate [6] [7] [10] [5].
6. What remains unresolved and why competing narratives persist
While affidavits, court filings and a partial release of DOJ files have given weight to Farmer’s and Giuffre’s descriptions, many legal disputes ended in settlements or sealed terms, some investigations declined to pursue charges for lack of evidence in specific instances, and vigorous denials and counter‑litigation by the accused keep factual disputes active; reporting and litigation show both corroboration across survivor accounts and procedural gaps — including early investigative decisions and sealed deals — that continue to fuel disagreement over the full scope of alleged misconduct [3] [6] [8] [11].