Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Are the claims that illegal migrants are released from police custody after committing serious crimes true?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses reveal a complex picture that contradicts the broad claim that illegal migrants are routinely released after committing serious crimes. ICE actively targets and arrests violent predators and convicted criminals, including those in the country illegally, indicating systematic detention rather than release [1]. The DHS has documented criminal histories of illegal aliens detained at facilities like the ICE Prairieland Detention Center, including serious offenses such as molestation of a minor, sexual assault, murder, and human trafficking [2].
However, the data shows that the majority of undocumented immigrants do not have a criminal history in the U.S. and come to the country to make a better life for themselves and their families [3]. Multiple research studies demonstrate that immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than U.S.-born Americans, with Stanford University research showing immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated and CATO Institute findings indicating they are 37.1% less likely to be convicted of a crime [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks crucial statistical context about immigrant crime rates compared to native-born Americans. Research consistently shows that welcoming immigrants into American communities does not increase crime, but can actually strengthen public safety [5]. The Brennan Center debunks the myth that immigrants, especially undocumented ones, cause spikes in crime [6].
Political actors and law enforcement agencies would benefit from promoting narratives about immigrant criminality, as it can justify increased funding for border security, detention facilities, and immigration enforcement operations. Conversely, immigrant advocacy organizations and civil rights groups benefit from emphasizing research showing lower crime rates among immigrants.
The question also omits discussion of sanctuary city policies, bail reform laws, and local versus federal enforcement priorities that may affect detention and release decisions. These policy frameworks significantly impact whether individuals are held or released, regardless of immigration status.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The question contains an implicit assumption that illegal migrants are routinely released after committing serious crimes, which contradicts the evidence showing active ICE enforcement targeting violent criminals [1] [2]. This framing perpetuates the debunked myth of immigrant crime waves [6] and ignores robust research indicating immigrants have similar or lower likelihood of incarceration compared to native-born Americans [6].
The use of the term "illegal migrants" itself carries political connotations, and the question's structure suggests a predetermined conclusion rather than genuine inquiry. The question fails to acknowledge that crime and detention policies apply to all individuals regardless of immigration status, and that most immigrants are not criminals [3].
The framing benefits those who profit from increased immigration enforcement funding and private detention facilities, while potentially harming immigrant communities through increased stigmatization and discriminatory treatment.