How many convictions have resulted from the Minnesota fraud investigations and how do they map to the charged defendants?

1. What the major news outlets report about convictions

CBS, PBS and several fact‑checking outlets portray a consistent, conservative picture that roughly 60–62 defendants have been convicted in the federal fraud probes tied to Minnesota programs, reporting "federal charges against 92 people with 62 convicted" and similar tallies in their summaries of the investigations ^{[1] [5]}; PBS summarized the Feeding Our Future child‑nutrition probe as having produced 78 defendants with 57 convictions at one point in the timeline ^[4].

2. What government press releases and DOJ reporting document

The U.S. Attorney’s Office and related Justice Department press releases confirm individual guilty verdicts and plea deals — including a federal jury conviction of two people in the multi‑hundred‑million‑dollar Feeding Our Future scheme and multiple plea announcements — but DOJ releases do not provide a single, consolidated final conviction tally in the materials supplied here ^{[6] [7] [8]}.

3. Administration and partisan claims that push higher numbers

White House and certain federal officials have cited larger figures — for example, a White House article claimed 98 charged with "64 the defendants have already been convicted," and other officials have said "more than 70" or "upwards of 75" convicted or pleaded guilty — language that appears to conflate multiple probes and to update counts at different moments, complicating a precise single number ^{[3] [2] [9]}.

4. How convictions map to the charged defendants (the Feeding Our Future core vs. spillover cases)

The largest cluster of prosecutions centers on the Feeding Our Future child‑nutrition scheme, where reporting tracks roughly 78 indictments and more than 50 convictions tied specifically to that case, while other investigations — into Medicaid‑funded autism therapy, housing stabilization, HCBS and home‑care programs — have produced additional charges and guilty pleas that push total convicted individuals upward; thus convictions are concentrated in the Feeding Our Future subset but are not limited to it ^{[4] [2] [10]}.

5. Notable individual outcomes and legal reversals that affect the total

High‑profile jury convictions and long sentences (for example, two jury convictions in the $250 million scheme and sentences like a 10‑year term and large restitution orders) are documented, but conviction counts can shrink or shift: at least one conviction (Yusuf) was reported to have been overturned by a judge, illustrating that raw tallies of convictions are not immutable and may change with appeals or judicial rulings ^{[6] [8] [10]}.

6. Why exact reconciliation is difficult right now

The investigations span multiple federal cases, evolving indictments, plea deals and trials across different timeframes; reporting snapshots cite different cutoffs and may include or exclude certain linked prosecutions, so available sources produce overlapping but not identical totals (e.g., 57, 60, 62, 64, "more than 70") depending on date and scope, and no single provided source here publishes a universally accepted consolidated count ^{[4] [5] [1] [3] [2]}.

7. Bottom line — best‑supported answer with caveats

Based on contemporaneous mainstream reporting and DOJ material, the most defensible summary is that roughly 60–62 defendants have been convicted so far, drawn largely from a set of about 78–92 federally charged individuals in the Feeding Our Future and related fraud probes, while some administration sources report higher numbers (mid‑60s to 70+) and some convictions have been overturned or remain subject to appeal — meaning the exact mapping changes as cases proceed and as different outlets count different cohorts ^{[1] [4] [3] [10]}.