How does minnesotas crime rate compare to texas

1. How the headline comparison looks: statewide indexes and rankings

Multiple compilations that synthesize FBI and other crime data place Minnesota below the national crime index and Texas above it, a straightforward signal that Minnesota’s per‑capita incidence of reported crimes is lower than Texas’s on headline measures (NextBurb) ^[1]. Broader state lists and rankings that draw on FBI data — used by outlets like U.S. News and aggregated tools — likewise treat violent crime as incidents per 100,000 residents, which is the metric driving most state comparisons (U.S. News; Wikipedia) ^{[4] [5]}.

2. What metro comparisons add: Minneapolis vs. Dallas and the urban picture

When the lens narrows to cities, available comparison tools report that Dallas posts a higher overall crime rate relative to Minneapolis, with Dallas’s problems skewing toward property crime while Minneapolis reports lower aggregate rates in those same datasets (City‑Data; Numbeo) ^{[2] [3]}. Municipal dashboards and local reporting can show different short‑term trends — for example the City of Minneapolis operates an open crime dashboard that allows residents to drill into offenses and timespans — but the publicly aggregated city comparisons available to the public still reflect the broader state pattern (City of Minneapolis dashboard) ^[6].

3. Trends over time and the national context

Analysts monitoring recent FBI releases conclude that violent and property crime have trended down nationally in recent years, and some annual reports noted declines in violent crime including murders in the latest cycle, which frames state comparisons in the context of a longer-term decline rather than a uniform surge in all places (SafeHome; USAFacts) ^{[7] [8]}. The national crime index figure cited in one compilation is 398.5 incidents per 100,000, which is the benchmark some state comparisons use when labeling a state above or below average (WorldPopulationReview) ^[9].

4. Why simple comparisons can mislead: definitions, reporting and geography

Experts and data projects warn that rankings and rates can mask important differences: states vary in policing practices, reporting completeness, population density and whether one measures jurisdictional cities or entire metropolitan areas — differences that change the story depending on which dataset is used (Wikipedia discussion of UCR rankings; CSG Justice Center) ^{[10] [11]}. The policy takeaway is that a “Minnesota vs. Texas” headline is directionally correct in these sources, but it flattens heterogeneity across cities, counties, and offense types.

5. Where the sources disagree or leave gaps

Publicly available compilations converge on the same headline — Minnesota safer than Texas on aggregate indexes — but the sources differ in scope (some focus on violent crime, others include property crime or present combined crime indices) and in timeliness; the FBI‑based lists and state tools are the most authoritative for year‑to‑year comparisons, while commercial aggregators can vary in methodology (U.S. News; CSG Justice Center; NextBurb) ^{[4] [11] [1]}. The reporting provided does not include a single definitive table showing the exact per‑100,000 rates for both Minnesota and Texas in the same year, so precise numeric gaps are not presented here in the available snippets.

6. Bottom line and how to read the numbers

Taken together, the available sources show Minnesota below the national crime index and Texas above it, with city data (Minneapolis vs Dallas) reflecting similar differences, but readers should weigh urban/rural splits, offense categories (violent vs property), and reporting practices before inferring policy causes or safety for specific neighborhoods (NextBurb; City‑Data; CSG Justice Center) ^{[1] [2] [11]}.