Was a baby pepper sprayed in a van in mn

1. What the reporting says happened near the van

Local outlets quote the parents’ account that law enforcement munitions and chemical agents were deployed into or around their van during clashes in north Minneapolis, leading the father to say three children — including a 6‑month‑old — were taken to hospital after the baby stopped breathing and lost consciousness, and the mother performed CPR while others tried to wash the children with milk to neutralize the irritant (Fox 9; Common Dreams; ABC7 summarize the family’s account) ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

2. Journalistic corroboration and pattern reporting

Independent reporting from multiple outlets documents the broader context: federal immigration agents were using tear gas, pepper spray and other chemical agents during operations and protests across Minneapolis, with witnesses describing pepper spray emanating from vehicles and chemical canisters left on streets — a pattern that makes exposure of nearby bystanders plausible and consistent with other eyewitness accounts (NBC, Sahan Journal, Democracy Now!) ^{[4] [5] [6]}.

3. What is firmly confirmed in the sources and what is not

The sources confirm that: (a) agents deployed tear gas, pepper spray, and other chemical munitions in clashes ^{[4] [6]}; and (b) this particular family reports their infants and children were hit by those munitions and that the infant required hospitalization after stopping breathing ^{[1] [2] [3]}. What the provided reporting does not establish is independent, agency‑confirmed video or an ICE/DHS admission that a specific agent deliberately sprayed a baby inside the van; the available pieces are eyewitness and parent testimony documented by local media ^{[1] [5]}.

4. Plausible alternative explanations and official response gaps

Officials’ public statements are inconsistently reported in the pieces provided: NBC notes DHS did not comment on some incidents ^[4], and other outlets describe instances where it was unclear which agency deployed irritants (CT Insider) ^[7]. That absence of a public agency admission or forensic detail leaves room for alternative explanations — accidental drift of gases into the vehicle, munitions rolled under the van, or agents firing into a crowd nearby — but the contemporaneous pattern of agents using chemical agents in the area lends weight to the parents’ version ^{[5] [4]}.

5. How this fits bigger reporting threads and precedent incidents

The incident mirrors other widely reported episodes where children or family vehicles were caught in chemical‑agent deployments around immigration enforcement actions — national reporting has previously documented families alleging that DHS or immigration agents’ use of chemical agents impacted children inside cars (CNN, Chicago reporting on a later cicero case) — lending context that such exposures have occurred in other cities and are not an outlier claim in the media landscape ^{[8] [9] [10]}.

6. Bottom line: answering the question directly

Based on the reporting cited here, credible local news sources and eyewitnesses say a baby in a family van in Minneapolis was exposed to tear gas/chemical agents and required hospitalization after stopping breathing; that is the reported fact set ^{[1] [2] [3]}. The pieces assembled do not, however, contain independent visual proof or an agency admission explicitly showing an officer aimed a pepper‑spray device directly at the infant inside the van, so while exposure and hospitalization are reported as true by multiple outlets, the specific allegation that an agent intentionally pepper‑sprayed the baby inside the van remains supported primarily by parent and eyewitness testimony in the material provided ^{[1] [5] [4]}.