Which countries are most common destinations for trafficking-related forced migration in 2022-2024?

Checked on January 28, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The dominant feature of trafficking-related forced migration in 2022–2024 is not a single set of “destination countries” but a patchwork of regional sinks: many victims remain exploited inside their own countries, while detected cross-border flows cluster in North Africa and the Middle East, Western and Southern Europe, intra‑Africa routes, and Gulf states — with significant detection spikes in EU destinations helping explain headline increases in 2022 [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. The big qualifier: most trafficking happens inside countries, not across borders

Any attempt to list “top destination countries” must start with the UNODC finding that most detected trafficking victims (58 percent) were exploited within national borders in 2022, meaning forced‑migration frames capture only a minority of cases and that domestic labor and sexual exploitation are central to the phenomenon [5] [1].

2. North Africa and the Middle East: hotspot for detected victims and transit‑to‑destination dynamics

Multiple analyses, including UNODC and INTERPOL cited in U.S. State Department reporting, identify North Africa and the Middle East as regions with high shares of detected victims, driven by large vulnerable migrant communities, weak protections, and corruption that turn transit countries into destinations for forced labor and sexual exploitation [2].

3. Western and Southern Europe: rising detections and demand‑sector exploitation

European Union data and the UNODC report show a marked increase in detections across Western and Southern Europe in 2022, with these countries registering substantial rises in victims trafficked for forced labour in agriculture, hospitality, and domestic work — a pattern magnified by targeted awareness and identification campaigns [5] [4].

4. Intra‑Africa flows and regional destination nodes

UNODC and UN reporting highlight that 31 percent of cross‑border detected flows in 2022 involved African nationals, and that most African victims are trafficked within the continent — meaning regional destination countries in Sub‑Saharan and North Africa play a large role as sinks, particularly for children and for forced labour and begging [3] [1].

5. Gulf states and irregular labour markets as frequently cited sinks

Country‑level reporting and NGO analyses point to Gulf Cooperation Council states — including the UAE — as common destination markets for coerced migrant labor, where recruitment abuse, passport retention, and wage theft can amount to forced labour; such destination dynamics emerge repeatedly in cross‑country rankings and State Department reporting [6] [7].

6. Displacement and conflict create shifting destination patterns — Ukraine example

Conflict displacement can both increase vulnerability and change destination statistics: European governments and EU agencies recorded higher numbers of victims in 2022 partly because identification efforts targeted people fleeing Ukraine, producing higher registered victim counts in EU destination states [4].

7. Data limitations and why lists of “top destination countries” mislead

Global administrative datasets capture “detected” victims across 128 destination countries in 2022 but remain uneven; UNODC stresses that 75,000 detected victims and broad country coverage reflect improved reporting rather than a complete census, so any country ranking is heavily shaped by detection capacity, reporting priorities, and targeted awareness campaigns [1] [8].

8. Short answer: where victims were most commonly detected in 2022

Summing the reporting: most detected trafficking victims were exploited domestically (58 percent), and among cross‑border detections key destination regions in 2022 were North Africa and the Middle East, Western and Southern Europe, intra‑Africa destinations, and Gulf labour markets — rather than a small set of single countries dominating global forced‑migration flows [5] [2] [3] [4].

9. What this means for policy and reporting

Because detection rates and identification drives shape destination statistics, policymakers and reporters should treat apparent “spikes” in particular destination states as partly a function of outreach and enforcement rather than incontrovertible evidence of new trafficking corridors; UNODC calls for strengthened victim identification, protection and harmonized data systems to make destination comparisons meaningful [1] [8].

Want to dive deeper?
Which European countries registered the largest increases in detected trafficking victims in 2022 and why?
How do Gulf states’ migrant labour systems create conditions for trafficking, according to UN and US reporting?
What methods do researchers recommend to correct for detection bias when mapping trafficking destination countries?